Maxwell 3D number of conductors question

AI Thread Summary
When defining the strand number of litz wire in Maxwell 3D, it is recommended to set the number of conductors in the coil terminal to one, as litz wire is typically soldered together into a single conductor for terminal connections. The effectiveness of litz wire in reducing losses from skin effect at higher frequencies suggests that accurate modeling in Maxwell 3D is crucial for realistic results. The discussion highlights the importance of considering frequency and the specific capabilities of Maxwell in simulating these effects. Users are encouraged to ensure that litz wire properties are correctly defined in the software for optimal performance. Proper configuration in Maxwell 3D can lead to more accurate simulations and better design outcomes.
Melon
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Hi guys,
I wonder when I have defined the strand number of litz wire in copper material properities in Maxwell 3D, should I keep number of conductors in coil terminal added in a winding the same as number of of litz strand? For example, 2 for strands litz wire and then 2 for number of conductors? Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Litz wire is terminated by soldering all the strands together and using one conductor for the terminal connector.
 
Baluncore said:
Litz wire is terminated by soldering all the strands together and using one conductor for the terminal connector.
Thanks. So I will set 1 for number of conductors when I use Litz wire type. Thanks for your help.
 
I'm not familiar with Maxwell, but here is my take on it based on theory and some limited experience.

Sort'a depends on what frequency is involved and what details Maxwell can account for. Since Litz wire was developed to reduce losses from skin effect at higher frequencies, I expect that Maxwell would give closer to real-world results with the Litz wire fully described.

After all, someone (the designer) considered that Litz wire was needed. Hope it is already in a library somewhere!

My 2-cents worth,
Tom
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top