Maxwell Equations, Lorentz Force and Coulumb Force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between Maxwell's equations, the Lorentz force, and Coulomb's law in describing electromagnetic phenomena. There is uncertainty regarding whether the Lorentz force can be derived from Maxwell's equations, leading to confusion due to conflicting information found online. Maxwell's equations effectively illustrate the connections between electric and magnetic fields, yet their intuitive application alongside the Lorentz and Coulomb forces is questioned. It is noted that the Lorentz force can indeed be derived from Maxwell's equations when considering energy-momentum conservation. Overall, a comprehensive understanding of electromagnetic interactions requires integrating all three sets of equations.
latot
Messages
23
Reaction score
3
Here the 3 set of equations we know, the Maxwell Equations, Lorentz Force, and Coulumb Force, actually I doubt a lot what set of equations represent all the electromagnetic aspects, I try research over the internet and I found a lot of contradictions in the answers, someone says we can get the Lorentz Force from Maxwell and others not...

In the end, I don't know the right answer, so, what set of equations can represent all the proporties of magnetic and electric things (yes, things, electro-magnetic, electros, protons, waves, etc, etc)?

What I can see in Maxwell equations, they are a nice way to set the relations betwen the magnetic and electric field, but isn't too intuitive if there in the middle of it, the Lorent and Coulmb forces are already applied.

Thx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maxwell's equations describe the relationship between charges and the electric and magnetic fields:

Charges define the electric and magnetic fields.

The Lorentz force (of which Coulomb's law is a special case) describes how charges move in the presence of electric and magnetic fields:

Electric and magnetic fields tell charges how to move.

Logically, you need both.

It's an interesting question, perhaps, of how little you need to assume about the Lorentz force in order to derive the precise format from Maxwell's equations. For example:

https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0206022
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Vanadium 50
You can, however, derive the Lorentz force ##\vec{F}=q(\vec{E}+\vec{v}/c \times \vec{B})## (for a point particle) from the Maxwell equations and energy-momentum conservation. You only need the energy-momentum tensor of the electromagnetic field.
 
  • Like
Likes atyy and PeroK
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top