Maxwell's equations and conservation principles

AI Thread Summary
Maxwell's equations can potentially be derived from the principles of conservation of energy, momentum, and charge by first defining the energy-momentum tensor. This tensor leads to the free Lagrangian density, which facilitates the derivation of Maxwell's equations in a vacuum. The discussion emphasizes the importance of translational invariance in ensuring the conservation of energy and momentum, linking these concepts to the electromagnetic fields. The necessity of using a vector potential instead of a scalar potential is raised, alongside the challenge of incorporating appropriate source terms. Ultimately, the conservation principles underpin the relationships between the fields and their interactions.
Delta2
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
6,002
Reaction score
2,628
Once we define energy and momentum carried by the field , is it possible to derive Maxwell's equations from conservation of momentum and conservation of energy (along perhaps with conservation of charge)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Once you have derived the energy momentum tensor, you essentially have the free Lagrangian density. From there you should be able to derive Maxwell's equations in vacuum. Add an interaction term for the equations with a source.

Conservation of energy and momentum is a consequence of invariance under time and space translations.
 
How does that link E and B fields? (i.e. how do you know that you need to set up a vector potential and not just a scalar potential?) And how do you add the right source terms?
 
You are right in the fact that I have assumed that the electromagnetic field tensor is the exterior derivative of a one form, which of course already is half of Maxwell's equations.

With regards to the source, this is going to depend on the field you interact with. Regardless of what field that is, translational invariance should make the total energy momentum tensor conserved and thereby guarantee energy and momentum conservation.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top