Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime can be written as(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\nabla^a F_{ab} = -4\pi j_b, \nabla_{[a} F_{bc] = 0[/tex] or as [tex] d*F = 4\pi*j, dF = 0[/tex], where F is a two-form, j is a one-form and * is the Hodge star. How do you show that these two sets of equations are equivalent (basically, that the first from each set are equivalent since I see how the second ones are equivalent)? I tried working it out in local coordinates but it got really messy e.g. derivatives of the determinant of the metric and I was unable to get anywhere. I also tried to work it out in terms of an orthonormal frame (tetrad) but that didn't work since I don't know if the Christoffel symbols for the connection have a nice form in that basis.

Any help would GREATLY be appreciated.

Note this is problem 2 in chapter 4 of Wald's text.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime.

Loading...

Similar Threads - Maxwell's equations curved | Date |
---|---|

I Interesting Derivation of Maxwell's Equations | Sunday at 8:55 PM |

Curved-space Maxwell equations by differential forms? | Feb 5, 2015 |

Maxwell's Equations in Curved Space-time | Jun 26, 2013 |

Initial Value Formulation on curved space-time: Maxwell's equations | Apr 24, 2013 |

Maxwell's equations in curved space-time | Apr 1, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**