Maxwell's Equations in Vacuum: Constraints on Wave

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
MisterX
Messages
758
Reaction score
71

Homework Statement



Condensed/simplified problem statement

[itex]\vec{E} = f_{y}(x-ct)\hat{y} + f_{z}(x-ct)\hat{z} \\<br /> \vec{B} = g_{y}(x-ct)\hat{y} + g_{z}(x-ct)\hat{z} \\[/itex]

All the f and g functions go to zero as their parameters go to ±∞.

Show that gy = fz and gz = -fy

Homework Equations


[itex]\nabla \cdot \vec{E} = 0 \\<br /> \nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0[/itex]
[itex]\nabla \times \vec{E} = -\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t}[/itex]
[itex]\nabla \times \vec{B} = \frac{1}{c^{2}}\frac{\partial \vec{E}}{\partial t}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


[itex]\nabla \times \vec{E} = -\frac{\partial f_{z}(x-ct)}{\partial x}\hat{y} + \frac{\partial f_{y}(x-ct)}{\partial x}\hat{z} = -\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t} = \\-(g^{'}_{y}(x-ct)(-c)\hat{y} + g^{'}_{z}(x-ct)(-c)\hat{z}) = c(g^{'}_{y}(x-ct)\hat{y} + g^{'}_{z}(x-ct)\hat{z})[/itex]

The -c factors come from the chain rule when differentiating B with respect to t. So then I have the following.

[itex]-\frac{\partial f_{z}(x-ct)}{\partial x} = -f^{'}_{z}(x-ct) = cg^{'}_{y}(x-ct) \\<br /> \frac{\partial f_{y}(x-ct)}{\partial x} = f^{'}_{y}(x-ct) = cg^{'}_{z}(x-ct)[/itex]

The problem is to relate the functions directly and not by their derivatives. We are given that the functions all go to zero as the parameter goes to +/- infinity. So maybe it would be okay to just integrate without concern for a constant added on. But supposedly the c factor isn't there. The answer is supposed to have[itex]g_{y} = -f_{z}[/itex]. How do I get there?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
B and E do not have the same units, so f and g must be related with an appropriate factor of c. There's probably a typo in the problem. Your argument about the integration constants makes sense.