Maxwell's Equations in Vacuum: Constraints on Wave

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the constraints imposed by Maxwell's equations in a vacuum on the relationship between electric field components and magnetic field components. Specifically, it establishes that \( g_{y} = f_{z} \) and \( g_{z} = -f_{y} \) based on the equations \( \nabla \cdot \vec{E} = 0 \) and \( \nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0 \). The solution involves differentiating the electric field \( \vec{E} \) and magnetic field \( \vec{B} \) components with respect to their spatial and temporal parameters, applying the chain rule, and integrating while considering the behavior of the functions at infinity. The discussion highlights the necessity of relating the functions \( f \) and \( g \) with a factor of \( c \) due to their differing units.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations in vacuum
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, specifically curl and divergence operations
  • Knowledge of the chain rule in calculus
  • Basic concepts of electromagnetic wave propagation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of \( \nabla \cdot \vec{E} = 0 \) and \( \nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0 \) in electromagnetic theory
  • Learn about the relationship between electric and magnetic fields in wave equations
  • Explore integration techniques for functions approaching zero at infinity
  • Investigate the physical significance of the constants in electromagnetic field equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism, as well as educators seeking to clarify the relationships between electric and magnetic fields in theoretical contexts.

MisterX
Messages
758
Reaction score
71

Homework Statement



Condensed/simplified problem statement

\vec{E} = f_{y}(x-ct)\hat{y} + f_{z}(x-ct)\hat{z} \\<br /> \vec{B} = g_{y}(x-ct)\hat{y} + g_{z}(x-ct)\hat{z} \\

All the f and g functions go to zero as their parameters go to ±∞.

Show that gy = fz and gz = -fy

Homework Equations


\nabla \cdot \vec{E} = 0 \\<br /> \nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0
\nabla \times \vec{E} = -\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t}
\nabla \times \vec{B} = \frac{1}{c^{2}}\frac{\partial \vec{E}}{\partial t}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


\nabla \times \vec{E} = -\frac{\partial f_{z}(x-ct)}{\partial x}\hat{y} + \frac{\partial f_{y}(x-ct)}{\partial x}\hat{z} = -\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t} = \\-(g^{&#039;}_{y}(x-ct)(-c)\hat{y} + g^{&#039;}_{z}(x-ct)(-c)\hat{z}) = c(g^{&#039;}_{y}(x-ct)\hat{y} + g^{&#039;}_{z}(x-ct)\hat{z})

The -c factors come from the chain rule when differentiating B with respect to t. So then I have the following.

-\frac{\partial f_{z}(x-ct)}{\partial x} = -f^{&#039;}_{z}(x-ct) = cg^{&#039;}_{y}(x-ct) \\<br /> \frac{\partial f_{y}(x-ct)}{\partial x} = f^{&#039;}_{y}(x-ct) = cg^{&#039;}_{z}(x-ct)

The problem is to relate the functions directly and not by their derivatives. We are given that the functions all go to zero as the parameter goes to +/- infinity. So maybe it would be okay to just integrate without concern for a constant added on. But supposedly the c factor isn't there. The answer is supposed to haveg_{y} = -f_{z}. How do I get there?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
B and E do not have the same units, so f and g must be related with an appropriate factor of c. There's probably a typo in the problem. Your argument about the integration constants makes sense.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K