Maxwell's velocity distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around issues with file formats while attempting to share a problem related to Maxwell's velocity distribution. Users encountered difficulties with zipped files and recommended saving documents in formats like PDF or .doc for better accessibility. A standard undergraduate derivation of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution was referenced, with clarifications on the probability function and normalization conditions. There was a suggestion to explore a simpler derivation using the central-limit theorem, but it was ultimately deemed not simpler than the standard method. The conversation highlights the importance of proper file formatting and understanding the underlying physics concepts.
Ben Hom Chen
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have some problem in the paragragh.
I save it as Word format.The link is below.
Thanks!

http://www.badongo.com/file/3337594"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I downloaded the file, which is a zip containing some xml docs I will not open. You won't get any help unless you show your problem and your work.
 
http://www.badongo.com/file/3383953

I upload my problem again.

And I found that when downloading it,badongo system set the default
file format as "zipped file",so some error would happen.

When saving file,we must change the saving format to"All files",then it can
be opened without error.

I hope my words can be understood><

Thx><
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry, Ben, nothing has changed. I can't read the docx format. Try saving your document as PDF or .doc.
 
OK, I can see the pictures. THis is the standard undergraduate derivation of the MB distribution.

1. \vec{v}^2 = v_x^2 + v_y^2 + v_z^2

2. Hmm. Maybe this should be "f(\vec{v}^2) is the probabilty of finding a particle with squared velocity \vec{v}^2".

3. The function e^{ax} is not normalizable unless a < 0. By convention one gives 'a' a positive value and writes the equation with a negative sign.
 
Thx for your help.
At least I understand the third answer^^"
 
I never liked that derivation, which I have in the Pauli lectures in it's full clunkiness. In fact it's possible to derive the MB distribution using a much simpler heuristic argument and I'll be happy to dig it out and post it if you like.
 
Thank You,I want to check it out.

If it won't take you much time.
 
  • #10
Well, I found it but it's not simpler and relies on the central-limit theorem so maybe the standard derivation is the best after all.
 
Back
Top