News McCain's Plan for Presidential Debate #2 - Will He Succeed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
McCain's strategy for the second presidential debate involves avoiding economic discussions in favor of character attacks against Obama, which could backfire and make him appear aggressive or desperate. The town-hall format is expected to play to McCain's strengths, but his approach may alienate undecided voters if perceived as mean-spirited. Observers note that both candidates seem more focused on avoiding losses rather than gaining ground, with McCain's reliance on personal attacks potentially undermining his credibility. The debate's audience composition raises concerns about fairness, as both campaigns may have influenced question selection. Overall, the effectiveness of McCain's tactics remains uncertain, with expectations leaning toward Obama performing better due to his ability to exceed expectations.
  • #31
Ben Niehoff said:
There doesn't seem to be any sort of indicator to tell them when they are running out of time. I think that may be the issue.

Yes, there are lights that look like stoplights - green, yellow, red. They're on screen every now and then - in the background.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Ben Niehoff said:
There doesn't seem to be any sort of indicator to tell them when they are running out of time. I think that may be the issue.
I think Brokaw mentioned the colored lights which inidated that they are running out of time or that hey must stop.

McCain is talking about his $5000 tax credit. That doesn't help the people who can least afford health care because they don't even make enough to pay taxes.
 
  • #33
Is there some secret success principle that candidates aren't allowed to discuss details of their policies? All I hear is general, idealized terms, but no real substance. Maybe I'm just expecting too much from politicians in general. I mean throw us a little something for christ sake.
 
  • #34
LightbulbSun said:
Is there some secret success principle that candidates aren't allowed to discuss details of their policies? All I hear is general, idealized terms, but no real substance. Maybe I'm just expecting too much from politicians in general. I mean throw us a little something for christ sake.

Well, keep in mind they're under severe time restrictions. Even a great communicator can't a lot of detailed information out in 60 seconds.

Go to their respective websites if you want more details on their positions.
 
  • #35
OK, I get the point about the lights. :P
 
  • #36
McCain needs to stop saying "my friends". I understand what he's trying to accomplish politically, but he's totally failing. He says it with such a dead, practiced tone that in no way instills trust.

Or rather, I should say, I hope he keeps doing it. Maybe it will help keep him from being elected.
 
  • #37
It seems that the worm is predisposed to penalize negative comments about the other guy.
 
  • #38
Obama gives a solid response on Pakistan, and now Mccain wants to school us on how to conduct military business. Pretty much he's acting like we're a third world country, that if we announce an attack then suddenly that will make us incapable of attacking. Way to go John! You tell us.
 
  • #39
I wish I could get my hands on the raw data of that running opinion poll on CNN. It seems to me Obama is doing better - I see a lot of flat line when McCain is up. But I realize I could be biased, as I am an Obama supporter. Which is why I would like to have the raw data...
 
  • #40
Astronuc said:
McCain is talking about his $5000 tax credit. That doesn't help the people who can least afford health care because they don't even make enough to pay taxes.
If I'm not mistaken, the $5,000 is for families, I believe it's half that for single people. My employer pays over $6,000 annually for my health insurance policy and they are a Fortune 100 company, the group rates they get are probably the lowest available.

McCain appears to be oblivious to the fact that 1) Individuals don't qualify for the lower group rates that their employers pay 2) That if you have a pre-existing condition, you may not even be able to get health insurance at any cost 3) that insurance companies can and will cancel your coverage after the first major illness or instantly raise your rates so high you cannot pay them, especialy if you are ill and can't work.

McCain is so out of touch with reality I just have to sit back and blink in disbelief.
 
  • #41
I'm surprised the opinion tracking graph doesn't go negative when Brokaaaaarw speaks. I think they disable it.
 
  • #42
lisab said:
I wish I could get my hands on the raw data of that running opinion poll on CNN. It seems to me Obama is doing better - I see a lot of flat line when McCain is up. But I realize I could be biased, as I am an Obama supporter. Which is why I would like to have the raw data...
After the debate, they will spend a couple of hours analyzing the debate and they will often refer to the worm results. I don't know if they have it available online after the debate, perhaps in replay?

The "wormers" are the same group through all of the debates, I believe. They are undecided voters in Ohio. McCain is getting much lower worm ratings than he did in the first debate, a sign of him losing in this segment?

I read the term "worm" BTW, I didn't make it up. They actually call it the worm.
 
Last edited:
  • #43
LowlyPion said:
It seems that the worm is predisposed to penalize negative comments about the other guy.

I think you're right about that, LP.
 
  • #44
lisab said:
I wish I could get my hands on the raw data of that running opinion poll on CNN. It seems to me Obama is doing better - I see a lot of flat line when McCain is up. But I realize I could be biased, as I am an Obama supporter. Which is why I would like to have the raw data...

I have seen a flat line a few times for Mccain. What's interesting is how the men will go into the positive range a little bit, while the women line remains flat.
 
  • #45
lisab said:
I wish I could get my hands on the raw data of that running opinion poll on CNN. It seems to me Obama is doing better - I see a lot of flat line when McCain is up. But I realize I could be biased, as I am an Obama supporter. Which is why I would like to have the raw data...

I think if that worm is reflective of Ohio in general, that Ohio will end up Blue on November 4.

I sense a potential landslide.
 
  • #46
LightbulbSun said:
I have seen a flat line a few times for Mccain. What's interesting is how the men will go into the positive range a little bit, while the women line remains flat.

And I see women being more favorable to Obama than McCain, generally.
 
  • #47
Evo said:
If I'm not mistaken, the $5,000 is for families, I believe it's half that for single people. My employer pays over $6,000 annually for my health insurance policy and they are a Fortune 100 company, the group rates they get are probably the lowest available.

McCain appears to be oblivious to the fact that 1) Individuals don't qualify for the lower group rates that their employers pay 2) That if you have a pre-existing condition, you may not even be able to get health insurance at any cost 3) that insurance companies can and will cancel your coverage after the first major illness or instantly raise your rates so high you cannot pay them, especialy if you are ill and can't work.

McCain is so out of touch with reality I just have to sit back and blink in disbelief.
I agree. A large tax credit doesn't necessarily help since the folks still don't have much of a choice as individuals. The question then is - how do we put all those who need insurance in a pool? Do we expand Medicaid or create Medicaid II?
 
  • #48
The last two comments by each I think exemplify the choice.

McCain didn't close the deal.

Obama did.
 
  • #49
Pat Buchanan on MSNBC predictably thinks McCain won again.

Any more of these "wins" and McCain will be in the toilet and flushed.

LowlyPion's opinion is that Obama won the debate outright. And his last answer was a remarkably expressed and polished answer that sounded Presidential, while McCain's last answer was a stump speech regurgitation.
 
  • #50
LowlyPion said:
LowlyPion's opinion is that Obama won the debate outright. And his last answer was a remarkably expressed and polished answer that sounded Presidential, while McCain's last answer was a stump speech regurgitation.

Maybe I wasn't hearing correctly but I didn't hear Obama answer the question at all.
 
  • #51
Greg Bernhardt said:
Maybe I wasn't hearing correctly but I didn't hear Obama answer the question at all.

Probably not. It was after all as Brokaw said a bit of Zen to it. But it was a polished answer and inspirational enough that at the moment I was struck by the elegance of his construction. McCain's was a bit of a ramble down a campaign trodden bumpy road.
 
  • #52
Greg Bernhardt said:
Maybe I wasn't hearing correctly but I didn't hear Obama answer the question at all.
Katty Kay, BBC News America, mentioned that most people were left wondering if either candidate answered any question satisfactorily, and that both Obama and McCain spend more time attacking the others policy or record.

Transcripts will hopefully be available tomorrow.
 
  • #53
CNN has refused to post coverage of the post debate "spin room", got to hand it to them for avoiding it.

Very interesting post debate poll results.

The CNN post debate flash poll show 50% say Obama won, 30% say McCain won.
 
Last edited:
  • #54
Another CNN poll of debate viewers gives the win to Obama: 54% to 30% for McCain.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/07/cnn-poll-obama-won-the-night/

An MSNBC internet poll has a ridiculous 84% saying Obama won.

http://www.polls.newsvine.com/_ques...n-the-presidential-debate?votedOptionId=25790

The Fox internet poll has Obama winning with 61% of respondents.

http://elections.foxnews.com/

From a CBS poll of uncommitted voters, 40% say Obama won, and 26% say McCain did.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/10/07/politics/horserace/entry4508356.shtml?tag=centerColumn;centerColumnContent
 
Last edited:
  • #55
Gokul43201 said:
Another CNN poll of debate viewers gives the win to Obama: 54% to 30%
Oops, yes 54% to 30%.
 
  • #56
I love how he said something about being irresponsible and john mccain said, 'yeah I said that!' and then he said that's the same guy that said bomb iran. His face got pissed.

McCain dug himself a big hole by opening his mouth on that one trying to be funny.

He also referred to obama as 'that one' which isn't going to play out nice.

They also didnt bother to shake hands afterwards.


McCain was more well spoken, once again. But I think Obama came slightly on top this time.

His ending remarks were great. He really connected with the average citizen. McCain came off as, oh my father was in the navy as an admiral and we were all alone with our mom.

Admirals make a ton of money. I'm sure he was flying high with his mom and brothers/sisters while his father was gone.
 
  • #57
I think it was more or less a tie. Obama didn't really gain ground, and McCain didn't really lose ground.

I've been watching Charlie Rose and his group of guest analysts discussing the debate. It's well worth watching. Someone commented that Obama didn't really inspire the audience, and McCain couldn't, even though he seemed to try, he's just not good at it.

Katty Kay mentioned that she was sitting in the media area and the 'din' started rising at the end of the first hour indicating people got bored. Apparently some/many in the media were hoping that McCain and Obama would be attacking each other more aggressively. Kay also made the comment that the serious debate got a bit too wonkish. I'd have to disagree with her assessment, since I didn't feel like either candidate really gave the level of detail I'd like to know.

As for the last question, neither Obama or McCain answered it satisfactorily, according to Doris Kearns Goodwin.

http://www.charlierose.com/shows/2008/10/07/1/live-coverage-of-the-second-presidential-debate (video should be available sometime the following day)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #58
Cyrus said:
They also didnt bother to shake hands afterwards.
McCain tapped Obama on the shoulder, but when he turned, he turned into McCain's wife, so shook her hand. McCain didn't extend his hand again, so Obama turned back around. That could have looked like Obama snubbed McCain.

The two strictly Republican commentators on CNN both agreed that McCain blew the debate, he needed to be strong, and he wasn't.

Obama made a goof when he commented on computers saying that a group of military scientists developed computers due to a need to communicate, nope that was the internet. Probably most people missed that.

Of course then there is McCain saying over and over America "needs a steady hand on the tiller", well that would be Obama. We know what a hot head Mccain is.
 
  • #59
I also got annoyed with McCain always calling me 'friend'.
 
  • #60
Evo said:
Obama made a goof when he commented on computers saying that a group of military scientists developed computers due to a need to communicate, nope that was the internet. Probably most people missed that.

I caught that. Glad he didn't connect it with the Internet though or we would start digging up the ghost of Al Gore inventing the darn thing again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 129 ·
5
Replies
129
Views
13K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
20K
  • · Replies 139 ·
5
Replies
139
Views
16K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K