Mean and autocorrrelation function

  • Thread starter Thread starter TomBombadil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Mean
TomBombadil
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to solve a random process problem:

"Let x(n) = v(n) + 3v(n-1) where v(n) is a sequence of independent random variables with mean µ and variance s². Whats its mean and autocorrelation function? Is this process stationary? Justifiy."

To discover the mean, I applied the expected value at x(n):

E[x(n)] = E[ v(n) ] + 3 E[v(n-1)] = \mu + 3\mu = 4\mu

To obtain the autocorrelation function:

r(n_1,n_2) = E[x(n_1)x(n_2)] = E[v(n_1)v(n_2) +3v(n_1)v(n_2 -1) + 3v(n_1-1)v(n_2) + 9v(n_1 -1)v(n_2-1)]

Since v(n) is an independent sequence..
r(n_1,n_2) = E[v(n_1)] E[v(n_2)] + 3E[v(n_1)] E[v(n_2-1)] + 3 E[v(n_1-1)] E[v(n_2)] + 9 E[v(n_1 -1 ) ] E[v(n_2 -1)]

But E[v(n)] = \mu, then

r(n_1,n_2) = \mu^2 + 3\mu^2 + 3 \mu^2 + 9 \mu^2 = 16\mu^2

I'm afraid that I made mistake evaluating the autocorrelation function..So, is there any error? If yes, could someone correct me? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your mistake is here
TomBombadil said:
To obtain the autocorrelation function:

r(n_1,n_2) = E[x(n_1)x(n_2)] = E[v(n_1)v(n_2) +3v(n_1)v(n_2 -1) + 3v(n_1-1)v(n_2) + 9v(n_1 -1)v(n_2-1)]

Cross-correlation is defined as

\rho_j=\sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty} x_k y_{k+j}

so the factorization you tried to do is not allowed. (Note that definitions vary. Sometimes c-correlation is defined as

\rho_j=\sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty} (x_k - \mu_x)(y_{k+j} - \mu_y)

instead. Use the definition from your text or class.)

Modify this to fit your problem and it should work out better.
 
If n1 and n2 differ by 1, then one of the terms of r(n1,n2) cannot be split up as a product of expectations, since the argument for both v's in the product would be the same.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top