Mean and var of an exponential distribution using Fourier transforms

Click For Summary
The discussion explores using Fourier transforms to calculate the mean and variance of the exponential distribution. The proposed method involves applying Fourier transform principles to derive expected values without traditional integration by parts. The calculations show that the mean is 1/λ and the variance is 1/λ², confirming standard results. A participant suggests examining the relationship between characteristic functions, moment-generating functions, and Fourier transforms for deeper understanding. A minor correction regarding a typo in the integral for E[f²] is also noted.
Master1022
Messages
590
Reaction score
116
Homework Statement
Derive the mean and the variance of the exponential distribution using the Fourier transform
Relevant Equations
## FT[f(t)] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(t) e^{-j\omega t} dt ##
Hi,

I was just thinking about different ways to use the Fourier transform in other areas of mathematics. I am not sure whether this is the correct forum, but it is related to probability so I thought I ought to put it here.

Question: Is the following method an appropriate way to calculate the mean and variance of the exponential distribution? Have I overlooked any technicalities to get to the result?

I know that the standard proof isn't hard, but I was wondering whether there are faster ways (saves having to do the integration by parts)

Approach:
So we use the following principles for the Fourier transform:
## FT[f(t)] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(t) e^{-j\omega t} dt = F(\omega) ##
## FT[t^n f(t)] = j^n \frac{d^n F}{d\omega^n} ##

Using the second relation, we can see that:
$$ E[f(t)] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} t f(t) dt = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} tf(t) e^{-j(0) t} dt = j \frac{d F}{d\omega} |_{\omega = 0} $$
and
$$ E[f^2] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} t^2 f(t) dt = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} tf(t) e^{-j(0) t} dt = j^2 \frac{d^2 F}{d\omega^2} |_{\omega = 0} $$

We have ## f(t) = \lambda e^{-\lambda t} u(t) ## (0 for ## t < 0 ##) and we have the standard result that ## FT[e^{-at} u(t)] = \frac{1}{a+j\omega} ##. Therefore,
$$ FT[ \lambda e^{-\lambda t} u(t)] = \frac{\lambda}{\lambda+j\omega} $$
and
$$ E[f] = FT[ \lambda t e^{-\lambda t} u(t)] = j \frac{d }{d\omega} \left( \frac{\lambda}{\lambda+j\omega} \right)|_{\omega = 0} = \frac{\lambda}{(\lambda + j \omega)^2}|_{\omega = 0} = \frac{1}{\lambda} $$
Now we can do
$$ E[f^2] = FT[ \lambda t^2 e^{-\lambda t} u(t)] = j^2 \frac{d^2 }{d\omega^2} \left( \frac{\lambda}{\lambda+j\omega} \right)|_{\omega = 0} = \frac{2 \lambda}{(\lambda + j \omega)^3}|_{\omega = 0} = \frac{2}{\lambda^2} $$

Finally we can use: ## Var[f] = E[f^2] - (E[f])^2 = \frac{2}{\lambda^2} - \frac{1}{\lambda^2} = \frac{1}{\lambda^2} ##

which yields the expected result.

Have I overlooked any details along the way or is this a valid way to derive the required quantities?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks good. You can take a look at how the characteristic function and the moment generating function of a probability distribution relate to each other and to it's Fourier transform for more insight.
 
  • Like
Likes Master1022
jambaugh said:
That looks good. You can take a look at how the characteristic function and the moment generating function of a probability distribution relate to each other and to it's Fourier transform for more insight.
Dear @jambaugh , thank you very much for responding! I will definitely look into those areas.

For anyone else looking at this forum, please note there is a slight typo in the post when I was copy and pasting the latex. The result is correct. The integral for the ## E[f^2] ## should read (I forgot the ## t^2 ## in the middle integral and instead left it as ## t ## when I copied the code from the ## E[f] ## integral):

$$ E[f^2] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} t^2 f(t) dt = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} t^2 f(t) e^{-j(0) t} dt = j^2 \frac{d^2 F}{d\omega^2} |_{\omega = 0} $$
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K