Mean Value Theorem: Proving Inequalities with f'(x)

kidia
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Please help me on this.

If f`(x) is continuous on [a,b],apply the Mean Value Theorem to prove the inequalities min[f`] \leq f(b)-f(a)/_ b-a \leq [Max f`]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
kidia said:
Please help me on this.

If f`(x) is continuous on [a,b],apply the Mean Value Theorem to prove the inequalities min[f`] \leq f(b)-f(a)/_ b-a \leq [Max f`]
well
f'(x)=(f(b)-f(a))/(b-a)
for some x in (a,b)
so what are the biggest and smallest possible values of
(f(b)-f(a))/(b-a)
 
please lurflurf clarify more and give me the values
 
kidia said:
please lurflurf clarify more and give me the values
Ok
remember a<x<b
x* is some number in the interval so
f'(x*)=(f(b)-f(a))/(b-a)
M>=f'(x) for all x
M>=(f(b)-f(a))/(b-a)
max(f')>=f'(x) for all x
so
max(f')>=f(x*)=(f(b)-f(a))/(b-a)
the min case is analogous

The idea is f'(x) may be greater than, less than, or equal to (f(b)-f(a))/(b-a).
min(f')<=f'(x)<=max(f')
so since for some x*
f'(x*)=(f(b)-f(a))/(b-a)
and for all x
min(f')<=f'(x)<=max(f')
then
min[f`]<=f(b)-f(a) b-a <=[Max f`]
since
min(f')<=f'(x)<=max(f')
is true for all x
including
min(f')<=f'(x*)<=max(f')
 
Thanx a lot lurflurf
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top