Meaning of calculating the mean

  • Thread starter Thread starter King
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
AI Thread Summary
Calculating the mean of a set of numbers typically involves summing them and dividing by the count, yielding a straightforward average. The discussion explores an alternative method of calculating the mean by averaging pairs sequentially, which leads to different results. This method is criticized for lacking clarity and not providing a meaningful representation of the data. It is noted that while various operations can be performed on numbers, they may not yield valid or useful averages. Ultimately, the standard mean calculation remains the most reliable approach for summarizing a dataset.
King
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Given the numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; to calculate the mean [as we all know] we would sum them up and divide, in this case, by 5. This gives 3. This is not the same as calculating the mean of each pair, which would be performed as follows:
1 + 2 = 3 / 2 = 1.5
1.5 + 3 = 4.5 / 2 = 2.25
2.25 + 4 = 6.25 / 2 = 3.125
3.125 + 5 = 8.125 / 2 = 4.0625

My question is, what does the above (calculating the mean of each pair) show us?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
King said:
Hi,

Given the numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; to calculate the mean [as we all know] we would sum them up and divide, in this case, by 5. This gives 3. This is not the same as calculating the mean of each pair, which would be performed as follows:
1 + 2 = 3 / 2 = 1.5
1.5 + 3 = 4.5 / 2 = 2.25

Why are you adding 1.5 to 3, it's not one of the numbers. The sum of 1+2 is being divided by 2 again.



2.25 + 4 = 6.25 / 2 = 3.125
3.125 + 5 = 8.125 / 2 = 4.0625

My question is, what does the above (calculating the mean of each pair) show us?

It whows us that there is an infinite number of ways to do something wrong.
 
Haha, nice. So what's wrong with it?
 
Well it's not the right way to calculate the mean. What do you expect it to show you? Why did you sum them in that order, and not, for example

(5+4)/2=4.5

(4.5+3)/2=3.75
(3.75+2)/2=2.875
(2.875+1)/2=1.9whatever

Given a bunch of numbers you can do whatever sequence of operations you want on them, it's just not clear why you would
 
King said:
Hi,

Given the numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; to calculate the mean [as we all know] we would sum them up and divide, in this case, by 5. This gives 3. This is not the same as calculating the mean of each pair, which would be performed as follows:
1 + 2 = 3 / 2 = 1.5
1.5 + 3 = 4.5 / 2 = 2.25
2.25 + 4 = 6.25 / 2 = 3.125
3.125 + 5 = 8.125 / 2 = 4.0625

My question is, what does the above (calculating the mean of each pair) show us?

The usual way of calculating the mean is (as you noted) adding up the numbers and dividing by the number of entries. However under some circumstances, depending on the underlying problem, a mean can be obtained by assigning weights to the different values (as long as the weights add to 1) and summing. This is essentially what you are doing in the second part.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top