Measurability with respect to completion

  • Thread starter Thread starter haljordan45
  • Start date Start date
haljordan45
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How can one show that a positive function with a Lebesgue integral is measurable with respect to the complete sigma algebra?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just as always, you must show that \{x : f(x)< \alpha \} is a set in the sigma algebra for any \alpha \in \mathbb{R}.
 
Ok, but how does the Lebesgue integral aspect factor into the argument?
 
haljordan45 said:
Ok, but how does the Lebesgue integral aspect factor into the argument?

You need to show the function is measurable with respect to the lebesgue measure. Thus given \alpha \in \mathbb{R} you must show that
\{x|f(x)< \alpha \}
is a lebesgue measurable set.
 
Also, a couple of comments are in order regarding your initial post.

1) It doesn't make sense to ask whether a function is measurable with respect to a sigma algebra. What you should be asking is how to show that the function f is measurable with respect to the measure space (which according to your post I can only assume is)
(\mathbb{R}, \mathcal{M} ,m) ,
that is, the real line together with the sigma algebra of all lebesgue measurable sets, and the lebesgue measure. Doing this is simply a matter of definition which I have given in the previous post.

2) It doesn't make sense to call a sigma algebra complete (unless this means something specific which I am unaware of). I can only assume the word complete here is referring to the fact that the space which I had previously mentioned is a complete measure space, that is for any subset E \in \mathcal{M} and A \subseteq E we have m(E)=0 \Rightarrow A \in \mathcal{M}.

Thus your post should have read:

How does one show a positive function is measurable with respect to the measure space (\mathbb{R}, \mathcal{M} ,m)
 
Back
Top