Measure distance between players in the field via radio?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of measuring distances between players on a field using radio technology. Participants explore various methods, including radio waves, ultrasonic range finding, and motion capture technology, while considering factors such as accuracy, device size, real-time signaling, and budget constraints.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Oleg seeks a small device to measure distances between players with a real-time signal when approaching specified distances (2, 3, or 4 meters).
  • One participant suggests that accurate distance measurement via radio waves requires wavelengths comparable to or smaller than the geometric features involved, proposing a frequency of 150GHz for 2 meters.
  • Another participant proposes ultrasonic range finding as a viable option, where a master device sends pulses and smaller devices respond with ID codes for position calculation.
  • Motion capture technology is suggested as a potential solution, likening it to systems used in tennis for tracking ball paths.
  • Several participants emphasize the need for clarity on parameters such as the definition of distance (e.g., from which part of the player) and the requirement for each player to carry a device.
  • One participant describes a system using transponders and fixed base stations to calculate distances, noting that this could be done rapidly but may be costly.
  • Concerns are raised about the limitations of radio technology, including signal strength variability due to antenna patterns and the complexity of managing multiple frequencies for each player.
  • Another participant mentions the possibility of using a single frequency with digitally coded pulses to simplify the system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and methods for measuring distances, with no consensus on a single approach. There are multiple competing ideas and uncertainties regarding the technical requirements and practical implementation.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of defining specific parameters for the distance measurement, such as the reference point on the player and the budget constraints. There are also unresolved questions about the accuracy and reliability of various proposed technologies.

fatelevi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I would like to measure the distance between team players in the field.

I need a device that can signalize when a distance between 2 players of the same team approaching a certain distance (2, 3 or 4 meters).

The device must be relatively small (in order to have in on a players), to measure an accurate distance (~ +/- 5%) and have to provide the signal in real time (less than 1/2 Sec.)

Is that possible with common circuits available.
I'm not an engineer of any sort please keep it in layman's terms.

Thank you.
Oleg
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
One of the things about radio waves is that if you want to get an accurate measurement of distance then the wavelength needs to be on the same order or smaller than the geometric features. At 2 meters, the frequency would have be 150GHz.

GPS is not accurate enough for what you want.

Ultrasonic range finding could be a good choice. One master device could send pulse. All smaller devices could send back their ID codes. A listening device could calculate everyone's position from that. This option is going to require a good knowledge of digital signal processing.

The best option would probably be to implement some sort of motion capture technology with a camera. Have you ever seen in tennis games where a player challenges a ruling and a computer traces the ball's path to verify the call? Maybe you could put the equivalent of a tennis ball on your players and a computer could track their location.
 
You need to give the issue considerably more thought and define some parameters.

First of all what do you mean by 2 metres distance?
2 metres from what part of the player? The kicking foot? the back of the head? what if the player is lying prone?

Then you need to clarify, can each player in both teams be required to carry a small electronic device?

Then there is the question of who is notified when the trigger distances are reached?
The player? Someone monitoring, who is not playing?

Then there is the question of budget.

I could conceive of a system where each player wore a small transponder which transmitted an ID signal to two fixed base stations. These would each perform a distance measurement and pass the information on to a computer. These two distance would be enough to 'fix' the transponder's momentary postion on the field. The computer could perform the distance calculation to every other transponder and display as required.
This measurement and display process could take place up to 1000 times per second which would be fast enough I'm sure.

We use something similar for using oil rigs about, but it is not cheap.

If this is a university project, perhaps your surveying department has an old Syledis or Trisponder that could be pressed into service.
 
Studiot said:
You need to give the issue considerably more thought and define some parameters.

First of all what do you mean by 2 metres distance?
2 metres from what part of the player? The kicking foot? the back of the head? what if the player is lying prone? The device can be on the player belt

Then you need to clarify, can each player in both teams be required to carry a small electronic device? Yes

Then there is the question of who is notified when the trigger distances are reached?
The player? Someone monitoring, who is not playing? First of all the player

Then there is the question of budget $2,000-3,000

I could conceive of a system where each player wore a small transponder which transmitted an ID signal to two fixed base stations. These would each perform a distance measurement and pass the information on to a computer. These two distance would be enough to 'fix' the transponder's momentary position on the field. The computer could perform the distance calculation to every other transponder and display as required.
This measurement and display process could take place up to 1000 times per second which would be fast enough I'm sure.

We use something similar for using oil rigs about, but it is not cheap. Can you please provide more details for this option.

If this is a university project, perhaps your surveying department has an old Syledis or Trisponder that could be pressed into service.

Thank you
 
It's a long time since I worked offshore. Both Syledis and Trisponder are obsolete today, but there is plenty about them on Google.
Modern miniaturisation should be able to make the kit small enough to clip onto a belt, but i think you would need some zeros on your budget.

Good luck. I will post again if I think of anything better.
 
Okefenokee said:
One of the things about radio waves is that if you want to get an accurate measurement of distance then the wavelength needs to be on the same order or smaller than the geometric features.

This is not true. I used to work for a company that manufactured units that worked in LF (200 - 400 kHz) to determine distances from about 20 to 100 feet. It's advantage was that it worked in the near field where signal strength drops off faster than 1/distance^2. Once set up properly, they were quite accurate and immune to multipath.

Studiot said:
You need to give the issue considerably more thought and define some parameters.

First of all what do you mean by 2 metres distance?
2 metres from what part of the player? The kicking foot? the back of the head? what if the player is lying prone?

Then you need to clarify, can each player in both teams be required to carry a small electronic device?

Then there is the question of who is notified when the trigger distances are reached?
The player? Someone monitoring, who is not playing?

Then there is the question of budget.

I could conceive of a system where each player wore a small transponder which transmitted an ID signal to two fixed base stations. These would each perform a distance measurement and pass the information on to a computer. These two distance would be enough to 'fix' the transponder's momentary postion on the field. The computer could perform the distance calculation to every other transponder and display as required.
This measurement and display process could take place up to 1000 times per second which would be fast enough I'm sure.

We use something similar for using oil rigs about, but it is not cheap.

If this is a university project, perhaps your surveying department has an old Syledis or Trisponder that could be pressed into service.

All good points. In addition, no radio antenna has an isotropic pattern (equal radiation in all directions). This means as players lean in different directions, the signal strength between them will vary not only due to the distance between them but also from the relative angles between their antennas. Also presumably the tranceivers would each have to transmit on a unique frequency and receive the frequencies of all the other players. This would be difficult to do in a half second. There are ways of doing this but they are quite elaborate and expensive.
 
Also presumably the tranceivers would each have to transmit on a unique frequency and receive the frequencies of all the other players.

I was thinking of using one frequency and digitally coded pulses. There are only 20 something players to code. Say the pulses were 10 microseconds long, you could get 100/2 pulses per millisecond.

The system works by having two or more base stations set up outside the playing field. These constantly send time of flight interrogating pulses to the mobile transponders. The return signal time would indicate distance and a computer could solve the positioning calculation on the field for each player. It could then solve the interplayer distances.

The problem is that the information available would be off field.

I suppose the computer could be programmed to send an alarm signal to players approaching too closely.

I think there would be no problem in the 2.4 or 9.6 Ghz range, both available for public device use, to cover the field at adequate resolution and speed.

But it would not be cheap.
 
Last edited:
Well waddaya know?

Bought my first Everyday Practical Electronics for ages (May 2010 issue)

And in the circuit ideas on P72 Thomas Scarborough of South Africa has a circuit just for you.

Based on 40kHz utrasounders the units could be built for about $10 apiece.
He says

The unit will break into oscillation when two units are 1 mete distant. Other distances can be made with more circuitry.

You would need an electronics enthusiast for a bit of development.

Sorry I can't post the circuit, for copyright reasons but PM me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
16K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K