Measurement of the Speed of sound

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the potential of using sound-based measurements to assess the impact resistance of polymeric materials like polycarbonate and PMMA at high velocities. It suggests that the acoustic signatures produced during impacts could differ based on whether the material resists penetration or not, allowing for correlation with experimental results. However, there is skepticism about the feasibility of simulating impact behavior solely through acoustic data due to the complexity of variables involved. The conversation highlights the need for more comprehensive methods to analyze impact resistance beyond just sound measurements. Overall, while sound measurements may provide insights, they cannot fully replace traditional observation methods in impact testing.
ismav123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hai,
I have a material related question. I am working with polymeric materials (Poly carbonate's and PMMA's respectively) which have to be tested for impact resistance (at high velocities). It came to my mind if the impact process could be correlated to a sound based measurement. Now i want to know whether there is a possibility or an equipment which could actually simulate an impact behavior (very high velocities) using such an equipment.
Thank you
V
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ismav123, Welcome to Physics Forums!

When a high velocity (projectile?) object impacts the polymeric material and penetrates is the emitted sound different from an impact which resists penetration?

If the sounds of the different scenarios were recorded their “acoustic signatures” would likely be distinctly different and could be correlated with each experiment.

One might then, for example, determine the impact resistance experimental results from the acoustic signature alone without visual observation.

But as for simulation, I cannot imagine how to use this data to simulate the process. I estimate there are far more variables to account for than simply the acoustics.

Cheers,
Bobby
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top