Measuring non-ionizing radiation

AI Thread Summary
Everything emits electromagnetic radiation while also absorbing it, with the radiation primarily influenced by the temperature of the surroundings. In a vacuum, energy exchange occurs solely through radiation, and when an object reaches thermal equilibrium with its environment, the energy absorbed equals the energy radiated. Different wavelengths of electromagnetic waves correspond to photons with varying energy levels, with visible light having higher energy than radio waves. While it's possible to convert high-energy radiation into lower-energy forms, such as using light to heat an object that then emits infrared radiation, the reverse process is less straightforward. To visualize radio waves as visible light, advanced equipment would be necessary to detect and amplify the signals effectively.
Great Smoky
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Does everything give off some sort of radiation? Example: water, oil, mud, etc. If so, how can it be measured?

Is there a way to translate a radio wave into a frequency in the visible spectrum and see it bounce off a wall?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Everything does give off electromagnetic radiation BUT it is also absorbing EM at the same time. Most of the EM radiation to which we are subject, most of the time, is due to the temperature of our surroundings. A 'hot body' will cool down in colder surroundings. If it's in a vacuum, then all the energy enters and leaves a body by radiation. Once a body is at the same temperature as its surroundings, the power absorbed is the same as the power it radiates.
One answer to your second question involves realising that EM waves of different wavelengths have photons of different energies. Light has photons with high energy. Radio waves have photons of low energy. (X ray photons have higher energy still). It is often possible to 'translate' energy from high energy to low energy. For instance, a beam of light can warm up a small block of metal so it will radiate Infra red - and all frequencies down to DC. The other way doesn't work, on its own, so well.
If you were to take a concentrated beam of microwaves, you could heat up an object enough to make it glow visibly. But the object would be radiating the whole spectrum of EM, corresponding to a 'hot body'. You wouldn't just get light off it. To do that, you'd need some much smarter apparatus involving detectors and amplifiers if all you wanted was light off the wall.
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
11K
Replies
23
Views
18K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top