Measuring polarization of a neutral object near a charged sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing an experiment to measure the distance at which polarization effects on a neutral object near a charged sphere become negligible. The experiment involves using a Van Der Graaf generator to charge a sphere and measuring weight changes in the neutral object at various distances. Participants highlight that the polarization can be simplified if the charged sphere is treated as a point charge, especially if the neutral object is spherical. However, for objects with complex shapes, numerical methods may be necessary to calculate induced polarization. The conversation emphasizes the challenges of verifying results and the need for appropriate equations to measure polarization.
Rick135
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am trying to design an experiment where I can calculate the distance at which polarization will not have a measurable effect on a neutral object, from a sphere charged by a Van Der Graaf generator. I am measuring the weight change caused by the polarization of the neutral object with a scale and measuring this effect at different distances. I have a problem in verifying my results, as i do not know an equation to measure polarization or something else which would help me verify this distances. Any help would be appreciated.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not generating any responses at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us? Any new findings?
________________
 
Your experiment isn't totally clear... but from what I understood, you're taking a charged sphere and placing it in the vicinity of another object, and you want to calculate the induced polarization of the object due to the charged sphere?

This in general is not an easy calculation, but it is simplified by certain geometry. If the charged sphere is homogenous (best if metallic) then you can treat it as a point charge. If your neutral object is also spherical, then it is not too difficult to calculate the polarization induced in it due to the point charge.

However, the polarization depends on the shape... if the object has a complicated shape, you'll have to do the calculation numerically.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top