Measuring surface tension / bouncing water droplets

AI Thread Summary
To measure surface tension experimentally, methods such as the drop weight method or the capillary rise method can be used. When high-velocity water droplets strike a water surface at a small angle, they can bounce off instead of merging due to the effects of surface tension and molecular polarity. The droplets may retain their shape momentarily because the negative charges of the oxygen atoms in the water molecules repel each other, preventing immediate merging. Additionally, an air pocket may form between the droplet and the water surface, contributing to the bouncing effect. Understanding these interactions requires a deeper exploration of molecular behavior and surface tension dynamics.
echoSwe
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hello!

Question one: How do u measure the surface tension? (I'm looking for the experimental method now, not the theoretical one by itself)

Question two: When ejecting water droplets at a high velocity at a small angle to a water surface/body, the droplets might not merge with the body of water, but rather bounce off it and lay a couple of seconds as droplets before merging with the body of water.

Why?

It has got to do something with surface tension and the polarity of the molecules being directed outwards I think. The surface tension in the manner that the droplets bounce off due to the speed they hit the surface at, and polarity because they don't merge. But how exactly does this work? I'm thinking that the H-O-H turns its negative side (the O) inwards in the droplets, and the surface of the water body behaving in the same way, turning the outer molecules inwards (the O towards the body itself). The charges + and + hence appell each other and the droplet may be able to float a while.

The question is how this works _really_? I've heard something about charged tops or something, or is it that an airpocket is created between the droplet and the body? Please help me =)

Cheers
Henke
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
I really need help??!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top