Measuring Torque Without Stalling Motor | Battery-Powered Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter blumist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measuring Torque
AI Thread Summary
To measure the torque of a rotating motor without stalling it, one can utilize the relationship between torque, current, and RPM. The torque is directly proportional to the current, which is influenced by the effective voltage across the motor coils. By measuring the current and RPM at a known torque, one can extrapolate torque values for other conditions. Additionally, applying a lower voltage to the motor can allow for torque measurement without stalling, provided the current remains within safe limits. Alternatively, using a weight and a spool to measure the time taken to lift it can also provide a torque measurement based on the weight and diameter of the spool.
blumist
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I need to devise a way to measure the torque of a Rotating Motor. Now i already have 2 ways in mind but both of them require that the motor stops while still being powered by a battery or something. ( I think we risk permanent damage to the motor )
Can someone point me to a method that wouldnt require the stalling of a motor and still give me the torque somehow? Also, is there anyway to get torque out of the RPM value of the motor? :confused:
Thankyou!​
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The torque of an electric motor depends directly on current. Relationship is pretty much linear, so once you know torque at some current, you can measure current to find torque for all other situations.

The current, in turn, depends on effective voltage across coils, which is applied voltage - back EMF voltage. The back EMF voltage depends on RPMs, and is usually also linear with these. So again, as long as you know torque at some RPM and you know applied voltage, you can figure out torque in all other situations by measuring RPMs.

Now, as far as actually measuring torque to get a reference point for either of these methods you can try one of the two things. First, you can apply a significantly lower voltage and measure torque of stalled motor. That SHOULD prevent the motor from burning out while allowing you to measure the torque, but you need to check what the maximum continuous current rating is for this motor and adjust voltage so that the current is not exceeded.

Another method is to time how long it takes for the motor to raise a weight using a simple wench. Weight * diameter of the spool = torque. Speed gives you RPM at which this torque was achieved. You can now figure out torque at any other RPM value.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top