Mechanics - centre of mass lamina

kolomsg
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hi, I'm stuck and I can't seem to find a simple solution to questions regarding how to find the centre of mass of a lamina.

for example:
A uniform lamina with mass/unit area 0.12grams/cm2 consists of a square of
side 80cm, with one corner at the origin O(0, 0) and other corners at B(80, 0),
C(80, 80) and D(0, 80). A triangle of material has been removed from one corner
by cutting a straight line from E(50, 0) to F(80, 40), and a particle of mass 0.5kg
is attached at C. Find the coordinates of the centre of mass.
If anyone could help me, that'd be much appreciated. thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi kolomsg! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Do you know how to find the coordinates of the centre of mass of several bodies, given that you know the coordinates of the centre of mass of each?

Apply that to the square, the triangle, and the particle, but with the triangle having negative mass! :wink:
 
hi, thanks a lot. it helped!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top