Mechanics - centre of mass lamina

AI Thread Summary
To find the center of mass of a lamina with a removed triangular section and an attached mass, one can treat the square and triangle as separate bodies. The coordinates of the center of mass for each shape should be calculated, considering the triangle's negative mass due to its removal. The overall center of mass can then be determined by combining the coordinates of the square, triangle, and the attached mass. This method simplifies the process and provides a clear solution. Understanding the principles of combining centers of mass is essential for solving such problems effectively.
kolomsg
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hi, I'm stuck and I can't seem to find a simple solution to questions regarding how to find the centre of mass of a lamina.

for example:
A uniform lamina with mass/unit area 0.12grams/cm2 consists of a square of
side 80cm, with one corner at the origin O(0, 0) and other corners at B(80, 0),
C(80, 80) and D(0, 80). A triangle of material has been removed from one corner
by cutting a straight line from E(50, 0) to F(80, 40), and a particle of mass 0.5kg
is attached at C. Find the coordinates of the centre of mass.
If anyone could help me, that'd be much appreciated. thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi kolomsg! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Do you know how to find the coordinates of the centre of mass of several bodies, given that you know the coordinates of the centre of mass of each?

Apply that to the square, the triangle, and the particle, but with the triangle having negative mass! :wink:
 
hi, thanks a lot. it helped!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top