MHB Mechanics- connected particles

Shah 72
MHB
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
Two particles A and B are attached to the ends of a light inextensible string, which passes over a smooth pulley. Particle A has mass 8 kg and particle B has mass 5kg. Both the particles are held 1.2m above the ground. The system is released from rest and the particles move vertically.
a) when particle A hits the ground, it does not bounce. Find the max height reached by particle B
b) when particle A hits the ground, the string is cut. Find the total time from being released from rest until B hits the ground.
I calculated (a) and got the max height traveled by B when A hits the ground would be 1.2 +1.2 +0.27= 2.68m
Iam not getting the right ans for (b) which is 1.99 s
t1= 1.02s
When the string is cut, Tension=0N , max height reached by B =2.68m, a=-g=-10m/s^2, u=0m/s on the way down.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Where did you get the 0.27 m in part a)?

We've asked you to show your work any number of times. Please tell us how you calculated a) and why you did what you did.

And always always always sketch a diagram.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Where did you get the 0.27 m in part a)?

We've asked you to show your work any number of times. Please tell us how you calculated a) and why you did what you did.

And always always always sketch a diagram.

-Dan
Ok I will post my working.
a)So by drawing free body diagram of both A and B, I calculated a=2.308m/s^2
Then I calculated the velocity with which A hits the ground by taking u= 0 m/s , a= 2.308m/s^2, s=1.2m, v= 2.35 m/s
B also moves up with the same velocity of 2.35 m/ s and also moves 1.2m upwards.
I need to calculate the X m it travels upwards and then comes down.
So I took u= 2.35m /s, v= 0 m/s, a=-g=-10m/s^2, s=?
I got s=0.27m
I added this 1.2+1.2+0.27 and got max height = 2.68m
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
887
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
897
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top