Mechanics II: Hamiltonian and Lagrangian of a relativistic free particle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Hamiltonian mechanics of a relativistic free particle, specifically addressing the Hamiltonian equations for a massless particle (m=0) and the implications of the Lagrangian formulation. The Hamiltonian is defined as H(q,p)=sqrt(p^2c^2+m^2c^4) with c=1, leading to Ham-1=1 and Ham-2=0 for m=0. The Lagrangian is derived as L(q,q(dot))=-m*sqrt(1-q(dot)^2), raising questions about the physical meaning of L=0 and the interpretation of momentum and energy in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics and its equations (Ham-1 and Ham-2).
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics and the formulation of Lagrangians.
  • Knowledge of relativistic physics, particularly the implications of massless particles.
  • Proficiency in calculus, specifically derivatives and algebraic manipulation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of Hamiltonian equations for different mass scenarios in relativistic mechanics.
  • Study the relationship between Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations in classical mechanics.
  • Investigate the physical significance of L=0 in the context of relativistic free particles.
  • Learn about the implications of massless particles in quantum field theory.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics, relativistic physics, and mathematical formulations of physical theories.

tzzzsh
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am given the Hamiltonian of the relativistic free particle. H(q,p)=sqrt(p^2c^2+m^2c^4) Assume c=1
1: Find Ham-1 and Ham-2 for m=0
2: Show L(q,q(dot))=-msqrt(1-(q(dot))^2/c^2)
3: Consider m=0, what does it mean?

Homework Equations


Ham-1: q(dot)=dH/dp
Ham-2: p(dot)=-dH/dq
L(q,q(dot))=pq(dot)-H(q,p)

The Attempt at a Solution


1: For m=0, c=1, Ham-1=1 and Ham-2=0
2: We need to find p in terms of q and q(dot) to find L. From Ham-1 with m=/=0
q(dot)=p/sqrt(p^2+m^2)-> p=mq(dot)/sqrt(q(dot)^2-1)
Using L(q,q(dot))=pq(dot)-H(q,p) and Ham-1=0 for m=0
L=-sqrt((m^2q(dot)^2)/(q(dot)^2-1)+m^2)=-m*sqrt((q(dot)^2)/(q(dot)^2-1)+1)

We are given that L(q,q(dot)) should be -m*sqrt(1-q(dot)^2/c^2) but with c=1 L=-m*sqrt(1-q(dot)^2)
Am I missing something simple algebraically or did I mess up a step earlier on?

3: I'm not sure what L=0 means. The value of H is the energy, so if the energy is 0 L=pq(dot). The momentum times the change in canonical position is 0?

Thank you for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tzzzsh said:
The attempt at a solution
1: For m=0, c=1, Ham-1=1 and Ham-2=0
Ham-1 and Ham-2 are the equations ##\dot q=\partial H/ \partial p## and ##\dot p=-\partial H/ \partial q##, respectively. I don't understand the meaning of Ham-1=1 and Ham-2=0.

2: We need to find p in terms of q and q(dot) to find L. From Ham-1 with m=/=0
q(dot)=p/sqrt(p^2+m^2)
OK
-> p=mq(dot)/sqrt(q(dot)^2-1)
Note that you are taking the square root of a negative number. Check your derivation.
Using L(q,q(dot))=pq(dot)-H(q,p) and Ham-1=0 for m=0
L=-sqrt((m^2q(dot)^2)/(q(dot)^2-1)+m^2)=-m*sqrt((q(dot)^2)/(q(dot)^2-1)+1)
Again, the expression Ham-1 = 0 doesn't make sense to me.
 
Can the OP rewrite this in LaTex code?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K