Mechanics net tractive force question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the net tractive force acting on a car ascending a hill, while it decelerates from 100 km/h to 50 km/h over a distance of 400 m. Participants explore the relationship between kinetic energy, potential energy, and frictional forces, while also addressing whether the driver is braking during this period.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest comparing the initial and final kinetic energy with the gain in potential energy to find the net tractive force.
  • There is a discussion about converting velocities from km/h to m/s for calculations.
  • One participant expresses confusion about calculating the height gained (h) from the hill's slope, questioning how to determine the value of h for potential energy calculations.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of using SI units to avoid errors in calculations.
  • Participants discuss the formula for kinetic energy and how to relate it to potential energy and friction energy loss.
  • One participant calculates the potential energy gain using the formula PE = mgh but questions the height value in relation to the distance traveled.
  • There is a clarification that the height gained is not the same as the distance traveled along the slope.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach of using energy principles to find the net tractive force, but there is confusion regarding the calculation of height and the interpretation of the hill's slope. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact calculations and the implications of the height versus distance.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the distinction between distance traveled and height gained, which is crucial for calculating potential energy. There are also unresolved mathematical steps regarding the calculations of energy losses and the net tractive force.

themster
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Ascending a 1 in 10 hill, a 1500 kg car slows down from 100 km/h to 50 km/h in a distance of 400 m. Calculate the net tractive force F between the tyres and the road assuming F remains constant and wind resistance can be neglected. Is the driver braking during this period?

I am told the answer is 379N but have no idea how to go about it
any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
themster said:

Homework Statement


Ascending a 1 in 10 hill, a 1500 kg car slows down from 100 km/h to 50 km/h in a distance of 400 m. Calculate the net tractive force F between the tyres and the road assuming F remains constant and wind resistance can be neglected. Is the driver braking during this period?

I am told the answer is 379N but have no idea how to go about it
any help would be greatly appreciated

Compare kinetic energy at the start and after the 400m with gain in potential energy. Then look at the energy lost by the friction.
 
would i convert the velocities into m/s?
Do I find the differences between the KE and compare that with the PE?

Would you be able to demonstrate it?
 
themster said:
would i convert the velocities into m/s?
Do I find the differences between the KE and compare that with the PE?

Would you be able to demonstrate it?

k.e. after = k.e. before - gain in p.e. - friction energy loss.
k.e. = 1/2 m v2 in general
friction energy loss = friction force x distance covered

You are looking for the friction force.

Always use SI units or you'll get the wrong answer:
meter, kilogram, Newton, meters/second, g = 9.81 m/sec2 etc.

Don't know what you mean by "demonstrate it".
 
but how to you calculate gain in PE? PE1 - PE2?
I know PE = mgh but what would the value for h be?

I meant worked example by demonstrate it :)
 
themster said:
but how to you calculate gain in PE? PE1 - PE2?
I know PE = mgh but what would the value for h be?

I meant worked example by demonstrate it :)

We do NOT do your schoolwork for you here. Re-read the PF Rules if you have any doubt about that (under Site Info at the top of the page).

Your problem refers to climbing 400m up a 1-in-10 hill. That is all the info you need to calculate the rise in height to give you the change in PE. Please show some effort in this thread, or it will be deleted.
 
ok sorry i didnot understand it first - i think i was confused by a 1 in 10 hill - what is it?
 
themster said:
ok sorry i didnot understand it first - i think i was confused by a 1 in 10 hill - what is it?

1m up for every 10m horizontal
 
rude man said:
k.e. after = k.e. before - gain in p.e. - friction energy loss.
k.e. = 1/2 m v2 in general
friction energy loss = friction force x distance covered

You are looking for the friction force.

Always use SI units or you'll get the wrong answer:
meter, kilogram, Newton, meters/second, g = 9.81 m/sec2 etc.

Don't know what you mean by "demonstrate it".


Would the value of h be 400m?
from my working i can't seem to get the answer
I converted 100km/h to 27.8m/s and 50km/h to 13.9m/s
for KE before i get: 1/2 * m * V before^2 = 1/2 * 1500 * (27.8)^2 = 579630
for KE after i get: 1/2 * m * V after^2 = 1/2 * 1500 * (13.9)^2 = 144907.5
for the PE(gain) i get PE=mgh = 1500*9.81*400 = 5886000

using the formula quoted, k.e. after = k.e. before - gain in p.e. - friction energy loss.
i re-arranged to get friction energy loss = -k.e. after +k.e. before - gain in p.e.
from this i get:friction energy loss = -144907.5 + 579630 - 5886000
= -5451277.5

working backwards, using the formula quoted,: friction energy loss = friction force x distance covered, i calculated that the value i need for friction energy loss = 379*400 = 151600.

the only thing i can think is that the height isn't the same as the distance 400m :S
 
  • #10
pe = mgh where h = height. Look at h again. Your last sentence above is a good hint! Surely you know the difference between distance and height ...

Also, the problem asks for the tractive (friction) force, not the friction energy loss.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K