# Mechanics of Materials - Where's my mistake?

1. Nov 15, 2011

### Femme_physics

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/6346/missrd.jpg [Broken]

Across the axis of a steel rod act 3 forces:

F1 = 80 kN
F2 = 50 kN
F3 = 30 kN

Crossection area of rod = 4cm2

What are the forces that are being made a the different parts of the rod, and what will be it's overall lengthening? Describe the course of the axial forces and the stresses through the rod.. measurements are given in cm.

E = 2 x 105

(the answers are in the screenshot above)

2. Relevant equations

[PLAIN]http://img831.imageshack.us/img831/533/neededformulas.jpg[b] [Broken]

3. The attempt at a solution[/b]

http://img840.imageshack.us/img840/6550/solutionto.jpg [Broken]

From some reason I'm getting different answers than given...but why?

Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
2. Nov 15, 2011

### I like Serena

Suppose you would saw the steel rod in half somewhere between A and B.
What would have to be the force at that point to maintain equilibrium?

Hint: it is not 20 kN, which is what you calculated for FAB.

3. Nov 15, 2011

### Femme_physics

It's not 20 [kN]? Then what it is? I thought you just do F3 - F2, no?

4. Nov 16, 2011

### I like Serena

Pick a point between A and B and sum all the forces to the left.

Or equivalently sum all the forces to the right.

5. Nov 16, 2011

### Femme_physics

Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
6. Nov 16, 2011

### I like Serena

Good! And yes, the stress force between A and B is 30 kN.

If you divide it by the surface, do you get a number that looks like the answer key?

7. Nov 16, 2011

### Femme_physics

Thanks I'll try to fix it all at home tonight and re-scan it. Got it. You're the best. I'll go hunt some op-amps now

8. Nov 17, 2011

### Femme_physics

Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
9. Nov 17, 2011

### I like Serena

It matters if you sum the forces to the left or the forces to the right.
The difference is a minus sign.
In your case F_CD has an inconsistent sign.
It's probably best to consistently pick either the one or the other.

Furthermore you will want your stress force to be positive, if it expands the bar.
On the section AB the only real operative force is F3 which points to the left, which would expand the bar.
So you will want F_AB to be positive and have the other forces match sign (by summing on the same side).

10. Nov 17, 2011

### Femme_physics

Ah, I got it I UNDERSTAND FULLY. Thank you.
http://img585.imageshack.us/img585/3945/f1000.jpg [Broken]

There's just one thing....drawing a "Movement graph of every point". I'm not sure how to do those. Can you help with me with it?

Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
11. Nov 17, 2011

### I like Serena

Good.

Sure.
I see you already drew force and tension diagrams... but the numbers don't match your diagrams...

As for the "movement graph", I take it that would be the graph indicating the expansion of the bar at each point.
How much is the total expansion at each of the points C, B, and A (counting from the wall)?

12. Nov 17, 2011

### Femme_physics

Ah, forgot to change the figures, oopsie!

Haven't we calculated it? 0.425 mm according to my last scan.

So this is what I got.......

http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/6533/111jo.jpg [Broken]

Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
13. Nov 17, 2011

### I like Serena

I see you got the proper force and tension diagrams now. :)

As for the movement diagram.
The total expansion is indeed 0.425 mm.
That is at point A!
So at point A you should have an expansion of 0.425 mm.
However, at point B the part of the bar to the right will be expanded less, by as much as ΔL_AB.
Same thing at point C, where the expansion is only ΔL_CD.
Finally at point D, the expansion would have to be zero.

Connect the dots with lines and you have your movement diagram!

14. Nov 17, 2011

### Femme_physics

15. Nov 17, 2011

### I like Serena

$$\begin{array}{| l | l |} \hline \\ \textrm{At }D & ΔL = 0 \\ \textrm{At }C & ΔL = ΔL_{CD} \\ \textrm{At }B & ΔL = ΔL_{CD} + ΔL_{BC} \\ \textrm{At }A & ΔL = ΔL_{CD} + ΔL_{BC} + ΔL_{AB} \\ \end{array}$$

16. Nov 17, 2011

### Femme_physics

Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
17. Nov 17, 2011

### I like Serena

Gotcha!

18. Nov 22, 2011

### Femme_physics

2 questions

1) I noticed I converted 4cm^2 to 400mm^2.... shouldn't it have been 40mm^2?

2) For doing that last graph, does 0 alway start from the wall?

19. Nov 22, 2011

### I like Serena

No.

I recommend converting units like this:

4 cm^2 = 4 (1 cm)^2 = 4 (10 mm)^2 = 4 (10)^2 (1 mm)^2 = 400 mm^2

That is, put the unit between parentheses, and replace it by the other unit, including the conversion-factor.
Then work out any powers and such.

Yes.

For length expansions, at the wall where it is fixed, there is zero length that could be expanded, so the expansion is zero.

20. Nov 22, 2011

### Femme_physics

Thanks.

I'm a bit confused how you made this conversation. All I know is that

1m = 100cm = 1000mm

Therefor 4cm = 40mm
and 40cm = 400mm

So how does the fact it's squared changes things?