(Mechanics) Pulley System Question

11 replies · 4K views · last reply
koolitzb
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Derive an expression for the angle alpha and determine the initial horizontal and vertical forces exerted at the point of attachment of the bell rope to the plank.
The system is in static equilibrium
Two-panel mechanics diagram: left shows a plank pivoted on supports R1 and R2 with 9kg masses stacked at one end, a bell with angle alpha, a pulley 3 and an 18kg weight; right shows distances a and b, angles alpha and beta, a 20KG bell and the 18kg weight.
Both ropes are light ie negligible mass.
The point of attachment has been circled in red on the diagram
The pulley wheel diameter may be considered as negligible with the pulley wheel central pin being at the same height as the initial height of the plank. the distance between the pulley pin and the end of the plank is 3000 mm

Distance a = 3000 mm, b = 0.75 x a mm

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Handwritten force diagram of a pulley system: a rope from a fixed point over a pulley to a 18g block, and a second rope with tension T1 to a 20g mass, labelled a, b, alpha and beta.

Handwritten working titled Resolve Horizontally: equation (1) T1 cos α = T2 cos β. Below, Resolve Vertically: equation (2) T1 sin α + T2 sin β + T2 = 372.78 N.
[/B]
Have tried resolving vertically and horizontally, but I believe there is not enough information to even establish an expression for alpha, yet alone the forces exerted at the point of attachment
Can someone please push me in the right direction as I have spent hours racking my brain.
 
Attachments
  • Two-panel mechanics diagram: left shows a plank pivoted on supports R1 and R2 with 9kg masses stacked at one end, a bell with angle alpha, a pulley 3 and an 18kg weight; right shows distances a and b, angles alpha and beta, a 20KG bell and the 18kg weight.
    WnfKPnN.png
    10.5 KB · Views: 1,932
  • Handwritten force diagram of a pulley system: a rope from a fixed point over a pulley to a 18g block, and a second rope with tension T1 to a 20g mass, labelled a, b, alpha and beta.
    f6reYeG.jpg
    43.9 KB · Views: 921
  • Handwritten working titled Resolve Horizontally: equation (1) T1 cos α = T2 cos β. Below, Resolve Vertically: equation (2) T1 sin α + T2 sin β + T2 = 372.78 N.
    cYT1NPY.jpg
    33.5 KB · Views: 845
Last edited:
I don't think they are asking you to solve for alpha. Different alpha's will result in different plank accelerations.
 
Sorry, forgot to mention the system is in static equilibrium, at the initial stage
 
Because a and b are known, you should be able to define alpha in terms of beta. Try drawing a dashed line up from the bell, and a second dashed line connecting the plank and pulley 3.

Or solve it as a side-angle-side? I can't remember the last time I did that...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
jackwhirl said:
Because a and b are known, you should be able to define alpha in terms of beta. Try drawing a dashed line up from the bell, and a second dashed line connecting the plank and pulley 3.

Or solve it as a side-angle-side? I can't remember the last time I did that...

I managed to get an expression for alpha in terms of beta and the distances, using the sine rule.
However I still do not see how it would be possible to find the components of the forces exerted at the point of attachment

Is it reasonable to assume the tension T2 in the second string (to the right) is equal to the 18kg x gravity (the force due to the weight on the end of the rope)
I did not believe it was but I can not find any other methods of working it out
 
koolitzb said:
Is it reasonable to assume the tension T2 in the second string (to the right) is equal to the 18kg x gravity (the force due to the weight on the end of the rope)
I did not believe it was but I can not find any other methods of working it out
Given static equilibrium, that is a perfectly reasonable assumption. Otherwise, the mass would be accelerating.
 
jackwhirl said:
Given static equilibrium, that is a perfectly reasonable assumption. Otherwise, the mass would be accelerating.

Ok, thank you.

Even given this assumption, I do not see enough information provided to be able to work out the forces exerted at the point of attachment
 
jackwhirl said:
What are your equations and unknowns?
The two equations found from resolving vertically and horizontally, T2 is now known as the weight 18kg, however alpha, beta and T1 are still three unknown

NEW
I can not form a correct third equation, I have tried using the geometry but something always seems to be missing
 
koolitzb said:
I managed to get an expression for alpha in terms of beta and the distances, using the sine rule.
What about this equation?
 
jackwhirl said:
What about this equation?
Handwritten working on lined paper: a = 2.6 m, b = 2 m, a/b = 4/3, a sine rule triangle sketch with sides 2.6m, 2m and angles alpha, beta, and 180 - alpha - beta, followed by the derivation alpha = 180 - beta - sin^-1(4/3 sin beta) labelled 1.

Sorry, forgot to mention I tried using that equation using the sine rule and it didnt work out due to the arcsin of the sin. Either way I don't believe this is the correct way of going about forming the equation from the geometry
That is the equation I ended up getting at the bottom labelled 1.

Note:
Apologies for the different values, but it is the actual concept of how to form the equation I am concerned about rather than the answer
Different handwriting as me and my friend are both attempting to work on this and are both completely stuck
 
Attachments
  • Handwritten working on lined paper: a = 2.6 m, b = 2 m, a/b = 4/3, a sine rule triangle sketch with sides 2.6m, 2m and angles alpha, beta, and 180 - alpha - beta, followed by the derivation alpha = 180 - beta - sin^-1(4/3 sin beta) labelled 1.
    Sp1vOib.jpg
    38.5 KB · Views: 693
Can you take moments about your red-circled point for the b rope?
The wieght of the bell is a CW torque and the T2 of the rope is an ACW torque. T1 acts through the pivot, so can be ignored.

This looks a simple problem, but like you I'm struggling. Moments seems the only remaining option.

BTW in post #1, a=3 m and b= 0.75a = 2.25 m, but in post #11, a= 2.666 m and b = 2 m. I prefer the values in #1, if you can choose!