Medical physics and medicine

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the collaboration between doctors, medical physicists, and medical engineers in the design and development of medical equipment and machines. It explores the roles of various professionals in this process, including the extent to which doctors are involved beyond using the equipment.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether doctors who have completed medical training collaborate with medical physicists and engineers in the design and development of medical equipment or if their role is limited to using the equipment.
  • Another participant highlights the ambiguity of the term "doctor," suggesting that medical scientists, who are also doctors, may not be the same as general practitioners in terms of involvement in device development.
  • A third participant states that in the US, medical physicists primarily focus on treatment rather than equipment design, indicating that engineers handle the design process and that doctors do not typically collaborate in this area.
  • A contrasting viewpoint is presented by a participant who describes their experience of collaborating with radiation oncologists, medical physicists, and technicians in designing a treatment planning system, emphasizing the importance of input from doctors in creating user-friendly workflows and quality assurance tools.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the roles of doctors, medical physicists, and engineers in medical equipment development, indicating that there is no consensus on the extent of collaboration among these professionals.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying interpretations of professional roles and responsibilities in medical device development, with some participants emphasizing the collaborative nature of the work while others suggest a more segmented approach.

|mathematix|
Messages
46
Reaction score
2
Do doctors (people who did medicine at university, be it MBBS or MD) get to collaborate with medical physicists and medical engineers to design, research and develop medical equipment and machines? Or is this the job of medical scientists and doctors only get to use the equipment?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
The term "doctor" is extremely ambiguous. More times than not medical scientists are doctors. Are you asking if general practitioners (family medical doctors) play important roles in medical device development, i'd guess not very much. It's like asking if an auto shop mechanic plays an important role in designing a new engine.
 
in the US, medical physicists are only for treatment, they don't design the equipments, the engineers do, which they don't really need to collaborate because the doctors arent the ones using the equipments, the technicians do.
 
I beg to differ. At my company we have had to collaborate with both radiation oncologists in order to design a treatment planning system but also medical physicists and technicians in order to design a user friendly and streamlined workflow. In addition, we have 3 medical physicists on staff to help with designing QA tools necessary for performing quality assurance on the device (FYI, our device is a real time MRI for IGRT). Granted, the majority of work is done by the engineers, but there is room for doctors and MPs (several sit on both our Clinical Advisory Board and Scientific Advisory Board - our founder is an AMP).
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
885
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K