Member Banning: Infraction Points and Refunds Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Varon
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Members can be banned for exceeding 8 infraction points, resulting in a 10-day ban, with permanent bans for repeat offenders. Infractions range from 1 to 10 points based on the violation's severity, while warnings do not carry points. Subscribed members, regardless of their subscription length, are subject to the same rules. Refunds for subscriptions are not provided upon banning. Understanding these guidelines is crucial for maintaining membership status.
Varon
Messages
547
Reaction score
1
Hi,

If one is a member who subscribed to one or five year. Do they also get banned if they violated or exceeded the infraction points? (is the money refunded?) Also how many infraction points before one gets booted out here? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here are the rules:

Disciplinary Action:
A member may be issued either a warning or an infraction if deemed warranted by an admin or mentor (usually from guideline noncompliance). Infractions range from 1 to 10 "points", depending on the severity of the violation; warnings carry no points. If a member accrues 8 or more infraction points, he or she will be automatically banned from Physics Forums for a period of 10 days. If a member receives any infraction after having returned from a temporary ban, that member will then be banned permanently. Obvious, incorrigible spamming or trouble making will be met with a permanent ban.

It doesn't matter if the member is subscribed or not.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Back
Top