Men: How Would You React to Being Contacted Out of the Blue?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the reactions of individuals when contacted unexpectedly by a woman expressing admiration for them. Initial responses include feelings of flattery mixed with suspicion, particularly regarding how the woman obtained their email address. Public figures note they often receive such messages, which can feel overwhelming or even creepy, depending on the approach and content of the email. Many participants agree that the context and tone of the message significantly influence their reactions; a well-crafted email referencing shared interests or work is more likely to be welcomed than a vague compliment. Some express that if they were single, they might be more open to engaging, while others emphasize discomfort, especially if the message is overly focused on physical attraction. The conversation also touches on the challenges of online communication, where initial impressions can be easily misinterpreted. Ultimately, there is a consensus that while such outreach can be flattering, it often requires careful consideration of how to approach the recipient to avoid coming off as strange or overly forward.

How would you feel about a woman e-mailing you with no prior contact?

  • She must be crazy

    Votes: 10 18.5%
  • I would be flattered

    Votes: 21 38.9%
  • Depends on what she looks like

    Votes: 11 20.4%
  • Depends on her personality

    Votes: 12 22.2%

  • Total voters
    54
  • #61
rewebster said:
shoot--evo---I REALLY, really don't know how long you've been drooling over this guy--but you must have mentioned him in other threads--so... IF he saw those 'other threads'---he'll see this one too.
I haven't seen any threads where I've mentioned his name. :rolleyes:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Lisa! said:
Tell him that you're doing a research on how would handsome and fascinating guys feel about a woman who contact them out of the blue...and now you want to have his idea as well!:-p
Oh, that's a GREAT idea, it's research!

Lisa!, you're a genius! :approve:
 
  • #63
well, IF you DO go back in and wipe his (last) name off of ALL your threads...let's see... what 'level' would that be on the 'Kung Pao' scale?
 
  • #64
rewebster said:
OK---MEN OF THE FORUM!---when was the last time that evo admitted to hyperventilating?
This is the first time ever, AFAIK.
 
  • #65
Thrice said:
Oh it's only a matter of time before one of us decides to act .. precipitously. It took me only a few minutes to find his name. Luckily I happen to find the situation quite hilarious as it is (for now).
I'm glad my predicament brings you joy. :cry:

<just kidding> :biggrin:
 
  • #66
Lisa! said:
Tell him that you're doing a research on how would handsome and fascinating guys feel about a woman who contact them out of the blue...and now you want to have his idea as well!:-p

I like that one! :approve:
 
  • #67
Evo said:
Discuss his work? I can barely understand on the most basic level what he does. I find it very interesting but I don't pretend to be able to grasp it. Quantum computing is just mind blowing.

So, considering that I am intellectually at slug level compared to him, what would you suggest? Remember, I'm a very likeable slug.

Oh. Ah. So, less a meeting of the minds, and more a ...

well, I don't have a witty euphamism...

So, you're hot for his bones.

In that case, NeoDevin has your answer.
 
  • #68
I would think that's kind of strange. Not crazy, but strange. I'd be flattered too because whenever someone admires me, guy or girl, I find it flattering.

What my response would be would entirely depend on the context of the e-mail. Also, it's not likely that I would comply because it would feel strange to meet someone that I randomly do not know.

So, I guess it's... flattering + strange.
 
  • #69
DaveC426913 said:
So, you're hot for his bones.
And his mind, I'm NOT that kind of girl!

I had decided to never date again, but several people told me that wasn't good, so instead I have decided to pursue the unobtainable. It's all or nothing.
 
  • #70
Taste a little bit, if you are not ill after an hour it is probably ok to try some more, if
you feel fine the next day gorge yourself.
 
  • #71
JasonRox said:
I would think that's kind of strange. Not crazy, but strange. I'd be flattered too because whenever someone admires me, guy or girl, I find it flattering.

What my response would be would entirely depend on the context of the e-mail. Also, it's not likely that I would comply because it would feel strange to meet someone that I randomly do not know.

So, I guess it's... flattering + strange.
I have no real hope, but I'd love to talk to him.
 
  • #72
wolram said:
Taste a little bit, if you are not ill after an hour it is probably ok to try some more, if
you feel fine the next day gorge yourself.
Are we talking about the barking deer?
 
  • #73
Evo said:
I have no real hope, but I'd love to talk to him.

Why can't you just walk up to this person?
 
  • #74
Ok, based on poll results, it looks like I should make an utter fool of myself and tell him I think he's cute.

He will think I'm nuts, but will be somewhat flattered. He will put my e-mail address into his spam filter. I will patiently wait for his response. Quantum computers will become a household object before that ever happens.

Does it sound like I have interpreted the poll and responses correctly?
 
  • #75
JasonRox said:
Why can't you just walk up to this person?
He lives on another continent.
 
  • #76
You could always do some research and try answering one of his questions. Might strike up a conversation and he'd really appreciate it (if its the guy I'm thinking of that you're interested in).
 
  • #77
Kurdt said:
You could always do some research and try answering one of his questions. Might strike up a conversation and he'd really appreciate it (if its the guy I'm thinking of that you're interested in).
Yes, he has questions, I do believe you've got it.

So, way out of my league? My experience though is that on a "personal" level men aren't looking for peers. What do you think?
 
  • #78
There's nobody out of your league Evo.

Well for me personally that wouldn't put me off, but then again it all depends on the individual. The problem with this type of question is everyone gives their personal opinion, you are weighing up what the average man would do and yet you know the situation only deals with one individual. Like I said before, just have a go in whatever format you deem suitable. You have nothing to lose at all and he seems like a very nice guy that's willing to engage with others from what I've seen.

On that note I should take my own advise and stop throwing in random suggestions :-p
 
Last edited:
  • #79
Kurdt said:
There's nobody out of your league Evo.
Sticks 10 GOOBF cards in Kurdt's computer.

Well for me personally that wouldn't put me off, but then again it all depends on the individual. The problem with this type of question is everyone gives their personal opinion, you are weighing up what the average man would do and yet you know the situation only deals with one individual. Like I said before, just have a go in whatever format you deem suitable. You have nothing to lose at all and he seems like a very nice guy that's willing to engage with others from what I've seen.

On that note I should take my own advise and stop throwing in random suggestions :-p
Excellent advice. I think I would always regret it if I didn't say something to him. A response from him wouldn't even be necessary, I would feel good just telling him what I think about him. I don't think he'd mind being told that he is appreciated. I've enjoyed listening to him and reading his work.
 
  • #80
Ok, just read the last post.

Yeah, I think that's fine to just e-mail him about that.

I've done it before and never had bad feedback. Keep in mind that I wasn't trying to come on to these people.
 
  • #81
Evo said:
Yes, he has questions, I do believe you've got it.

So, way out of my league? My experience though is that on a "personal" level men aren't looking for peers. What do you think?

my, my, my--I get the feeling you feel/(or were born) out of place (or time/(MWI)--you know, it's too bad you didn't live a hundred years ago...


Waterhouse to paint you...

Einstein to marry you...


and Freud to analyze you...


(especially, being a damsel in distress, Waterhouse to paint you...)


___________________________

maybe this guy (what's his face) would be (at least) good to talk to...

----------

I voted (finally)
 
Last edited:
  • #82
Out of those, I'd probably go for crazy -- simply because an email's so impersonal.

You should stalk him in real life first... :biggrin:
 
  • #83
Evo said:
My experience though is that on a "personal" level men aren't looking for peers.
That would not apply in my case.

I agree with Kurdt about the research.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_quantum_computing
First use of Deutsch's Algorithm in a cluster state quantum computer
http://www.physorg.com/news96107220.html


Besides, he might be interested. He might find it enjoyable to talk to an attractive woman about his work, or perhaps other mutual interests.

Regarding the approach, a direct (blunt and straightforward) approach might be fine with one's familiars, but it would seem to often have an adverse impact on strangers.


Getting there isn't that expensive, and it's about the same as a coast-to-coast trip in the US - well from where I am. Sometimes, it's cheaper to go Manchester, Birmingham or London that it is to the west coast.

Currently one can travel to LGW from one's nearest airport for $841, and there maybe less expensive flights. :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
  • #84
Evo said:
He lives on another continent.
So those emails are from you... :-p
 
  • #85
I wouldn't date someone on another continent!
 
  • #86
JasonRox said:
I wouldn't date someone on another continent!
Why? That would seem to unnecessarily limit one's opportunities.

I met a Brit earlier this year who met a Canadian woman online. They hit if off. He visited Canada. They are now married and living in the UK.

If one was living in Toronto or Halifax, and discovered someone in Vancouver, or vice versa, or in NY/LA, and they hit if off, it's no different than living in the US and finding someone in Europe, Asia, S. America or Africa. The internet has enabled a global reach with a short cycle time.

I have a number of friends overseas and correspond with them as I do friends in the US. It would be just as easy for me to visit friends in Europe as it would be to visit friends scattered around the US.
 
Last edited:
  • #87
JasonRox said:
I wouldn't date someone on another continent!
I suggested this one to my wife. She said she was staying put.
 
  • #88
J77 said:
Out of those, I'd probably go for crazy -- simply because an email's so impersonal.

You should stalk him in real life first... :biggrin:
:smile: So, I could print out the e-mail and hand it to him for a personal touch?

Astronuc said:
That would not apply in my case.
You seriously would look for a Nuclear Engineer to date if you were single?

I agree with Kurdt about the research.
He meant research about certain questions. I've read a lot of Deutsch's work over the last 4-5 years. Max Tegmart is really good at explaining things in layman's terms. Reading his explanations causes those moments of "oh, now I get it".

Besides, he might be interested. He might find it enjoyable to talk to an attractive woman about his work, or perhaps other mutual interests.
I need a Cyrano.

Regarding the approach, a direct (blunt and straightforward) approach might be fine with one's familiars, but it would seem to often have an adverse impact on strangers.
I'm not coy, and I can't bring myself to be artificial in order to lure someone in.

There is no way I'm going to stalk someone in person, THAT would be crazy, I'm happy stalking via e-mail. :smile:
 
  • #89
Evo said:
You seriously would look for a Nuclear Engineer to date if you were single?
Not necessarily. Peer doesn't necessarily infer a person with the same background. On the other hand, I have a very close female friend who is a PhD nuclear engineer. So it's possible.

On the other hand, I have a broad technical background and an array of interests.

I'd be looking for someone who had a similar taste in music (e.g. Moody Blues, Led Zepplin, Traffic, Spirit, EL&P, . . . to Jazz, Celtic, and Classical Music) and arts, hsitory, gardening, cooking, outdoors, as well as an intellectual curiosity and some understanding of math and science. I like to go to museums. I like to travel to different places around the world. But then I like quiet evenings at home.

A big problem when I was dating was that most women couldn't related to my field in applied physics and engineering. If I mentioned particle or astrophysics or nuclear engineering, that didn't get a great response.

There were plenty of women who found me attractive or hot, but for me, that wasn't important - and I wasn't interested.

The most important aspect for me was to find a woman with whom I could share my thoughts - i.e. I could open my mind to her and she wouldn't be intimidated.

Evo said:
I need a Cyrano.
Que? Funny, I was once likened to Cyrano de Bergerac because of my nose (which never bothered me). I never suffered from self-doubt.

And NO - you definitely don't need a Cryano.

Evo said:
I'm not coy, and I can't bring myself to be artificial in order to lure someone in.
Of course not, nor did I suggest such. I was simply saying that direct approach is more likely successful with someone with whom one is familiar, as opposed to a complete stranger. The context is important.
 
Last edited:
  • #90
Astronuc said:
Of course not, nor did I suggest such.
I was going to say that you weren't suggesting that.
I was simply saying that direct approach is more likely successful with someone with whom one is familiar, as opposed to a complete stranger. The context is important.
I do tend to frighten men off, but then if they don't like the fact that I am clear and upfront about things, it's probably better to weed them out in the beginning. Of course there could be innocent casualties, that's always a risk.
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 126 ·
5
Replies
126
Views
42K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
98
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K