MHB Metallurgy- Road Construction - linear equation

AI Thread Summary
To produce 18-karat gold from 15 grams of 14-karat gold, 10 grams of pure gold should be melted. In road construction, after the new machine works for 4 hours, it completes one-third of the job, leaving two-thirds for the older machine. The older machine, which takes 16 hours to complete half a mile, will take approximately 10 and 2/3 hours to finish the remaining work. A straightforward method for the second problem involves calculating the portion completed by the new machine and determining the remaining work for the older machine. Overall, both problems can be approached with different methods for clarity and verification.
paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
1. Metallurgy. How much pure gold should be melted with
15 grams of 14-karat gold to produce 18-karat gold?

2. Road Construction. A new machine that deposits cement
for a road requires 12 hours to complete a one-half mile section of road. An older machine requires 16 hours to pave the same amount of road. After depositing cement for 4 hours, the new machine develops a mechanical problem and quits working. The older machine is brought into place and continues the job. How long does it take the older machine to complete the job?

my attempt on 1st problem
x = amount of pure gold
$15\frac{14}{24}+x=\frac{18}{24}(15+x)$

x = 10 grams

for 2nd I get the correct answer but I'm not sure If I modeled the situation correctly.

$\frac{0.5}{12}\cdot 4+\frac{0.5}{16}\cdot x=0.5$

x = 10 and 2/3 hr.

can you give me a more straight forward method for problem 1 and 2. just for variety-of-method's sake.

thanks!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
paulmdrdo said:
1. Metallurgy. How much pure gold should be melted with
15 grams of 14-karat gold to produce 18-karat gold?
...
my attempt on 1st problem
x = amount of pure gold
$15\frac{14}{24}+x=\frac{18}{24}(15+x)$

x = 10 grams
I agree.

paulmdrdo said:
2. Road Construction. A new machine that deposits cement
for a road requires 12 hours to complete a one-half mile section of road. An older machine requires 16 hours to pave the same amount of road. After depositing cement for 4 hours, the new machine develops a mechanical problem and quits working. The older machine is brought into place and continues the job. How long does it take the older machine to complete the job?
...
$\frac{0.5}{12}\cdot 4+\frac{0.5}{16}\cdot x=0.5$

x = 10 and 2/3 hr.
To help checking, it's good to say what $x$ represents. I assume it is the time it take the older machine to complete the job. Then $4/12$ is the part of the road completed by the new machine, and $x/16$ is the part completed by the old machine. Together they make up 1, i.e.,
\[
\frac{4}{12}+\frac{x}{16}=1.
\]
This equation is equivalent to yours, but I don't understand what 0.5 represents in your equation.

I would solve the second problem without equations. The part completed by the new machine is 4/12 = 1/3. The remaining part is 1 - 1/3 = 2/3. Therefore, the old machine has to work 16 * 2/3 = 10 2/3.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top