MHB Metallurgy- Road Construction - linear equation

paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
1. Metallurgy. How much pure gold should be melted with
15 grams of 14-karat gold to produce 18-karat gold?

2. Road Construction. A new machine that deposits cement
for a road requires 12 hours to complete a one-half mile section of road. An older machine requires 16 hours to pave the same amount of road. After depositing cement for 4 hours, the new machine develops a mechanical problem and quits working. The older machine is brought into place and continues the job. How long does it take the older machine to complete the job?

my attempt on 1st problem
x = amount of pure gold
$15\frac{14}{24}+x=\frac{18}{24}(15+x)$

x = 10 grams

for 2nd I get the correct answer but I'm not sure If I modeled the situation correctly.

$\frac{0.5}{12}\cdot 4+\frac{0.5}{16}\cdot x=0.5$

x = 10 and 2/3 hr.

can you give me a more straight forward method for problem 1 and 2. just for variety-of-method's sake.

thanks!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
paulmdrdo said:
1. Metallurgy. How much pure gold should be melted with
15 grams of 14-karat gold to produce 18-karat gold?
...
my attempt on 1st problem
x = amount of pure gold
$15\frac{14}{24}+x=\frac{18}{24}(15+x)$

x = 10 grams
I agree.

paulmdrdo said:
2. Road Construction. A new machine that deposits cement
for a road requires 12 hours to complete a one-half mile section of road. An older machine requires 16 hours to pave the same amount of road. After depositing cement for 4 hours, the new machine develops a mechanical problem and quits working. The older machine is brought into place and continues the job. How long does it take the older machine to complete the job?
...
$\frac{0.5}{12}\cdot 4+\frac{0.5}{16}\cdot x=0.5$

x = 10 and 2/3 hr.
To help checking, it's good to say what $x$ represents. I assume it is the time it take the older machine to complete the job. Then $4/12$ is the part of the road completed by the new machine, and $x/16$ is the part completed by the old machine. Together they make up 1, i.e.,
\[
\frac{4}{12}+\frac{x}{16}=1.
\]
This equation is equivalent to yours, but I don't understand what 0.5 represents in your equation.

I would solve the second problem without equations. The part completed by the new machine is 4/12 = 1/3. The remaining part is 1 - 1/3 = 2/3. Therefore, the old machine has to work 16 * 2/3 = 10 2/3.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top