Method of images and infinite conducting sheet

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an infinite conducting sheet with a hemispherical bubble of radius a, focusing on the potential and boundary conditions in a three-dimensional context. Participants are exploring the implications of these conditions and the method of images in electrostatics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of considering a 3D case due to the hemispherical nature of the bubble. There are attempts to apply the method of images, with suggestions of using multiple image charges to satisfy boundary conditions. Questions arise about the convergence of the series of image charges and the potential need for additional charges to cancel out remaining terms.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various participants contributing ideas about the placement of image charges and the potential for a series of images to converge. Some participants express confusion about the mixed case and seek clarification on how to apply known solutions for simpler geometries to this scenario.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenges posed by the mixed geometry of the problem, as well as their varying levels of comfort with the CGS units involved. There is an acknowledgment of the need for more than one image charge to meet the boundary conditions effectively.

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


An infinite conducting sheet has a hemispherical bubble of radius a. (Refer to the diagram)

2. The attempt at a solution

ok i know the boundary conditions should be (Phi refresents the potential)
And we are working in CGS units... units with which i am not entire comfortable.
Z is the vertical and Y is the horizontal
[itex]\Phi(y, \sqrt{a^2 - y^2}) = 0[/itex] for [itex]-a\leq y\leq a[/itex]
[itex]\Phi(y,0) = 0[/itex] where y<= -a and y=> a

Should i be considering the 3D case because it does say bubble...
i know how to do this for a plane and a sphere but this 'mixed' case has got me confused.

i thought of locating a charge at a point (-z0+2a,0) and that satisifes condition 1 but not condition 2

it doesn't work for any point other tan this one so no..

maybe i am not thinking about something and so I am stuck!

i think that there would be more than one point charge on th segment y = -z0 +2a

Thanks for your input!
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    5.5 KB · Views: 1,192
Physics news on Phys.org
hi stunner. i think you should be thinking about the 3d case. i remember doing this problem a while back. your right to set the potential to zero on the conductor. i remember having to place more than one image charge to make it work.
 
NB: the 3D case is actually much simpler... you may need a series of images .. hopefully it will converge (ie. the magnitude of the image charge you insert will progressively become smaller) my guess is that all of them will be on the Z axis judging by the symmetry of the problem.
 
i was thinking there were more than 1 image charges

i thought of a sperposition between the case of the plane and the case of a hemisphere (which is similar to that a sphere, i think)

for the plane

[tex]V = q \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + (z-z_{0}}^2}} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + (z+z_{0})^2}}\right)[/tex]

for the hemisphere ... satisifes all those requirement of a sphere for y > 0

[tex]V = q \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{r^2 + z_{0}^2 - 2rz_{0}\cos\theta}} - \frac{a/z_{0}}{\sqrt{r^2 + (a^2/z_{0})^2 - 2r(a^2/z_{0})\cos\theta}}[/tex]

where d
i think i t would be better to convert to cartesian coords
then the solution for the hemisphere is
[tex]V = q \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + (z-z_{0})^2}} - \frac{(a^2/z_{0})}{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + (z-(a^2/z_{0})^2}}\right)[/tex]

the potential is then
[tex]V = q\left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + (z-z_{0})^2}} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + (z+z_{0})^2}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + (z-z_{0})^2}} - \frac{(a^2/z_{0})}{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + (z-(a^2/z_{0})^2}} \right)[/tex]

this will not satisfy the boundary condtion when y>=a and y<= -a entirely as the 2nd and 3rd terms will not disappear.

need another charge to cancel those terms which remain
[tex]V(0,y,0) = q\left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{y^2+z_{0}^2}} - \frac{q(a^2/z_{0})}{\sqrt{y^2+(a^2/z_{0})^2}} \right)[/tex]

would i add some charge q' located ebtween the two image charges to cancel out the remaining terms?? Please help!
 
As u can see, you need more and more charges, that's why I suggested a series of images. I must admit I haven't tried solving this in full, but if i were you that's the step I will try:
continue adding in images to "fix up" any problems, check and see whether the magnitude of the newly included charges are progressively getting smaller, if so i suspect that the series would converge as your charges should be alternating in sign, if not, they may be conditionally convergent (much harder to prove sometimes) good luck
 
stunner5000pt said:

Homework Statement


An infinite conducting sheet has a hemispherical bubble of radius a. (Refer to the diagram)
1. To make the plane grounded, put -q at -z_0.
2. To make the sphere grounded put image charges -qa/z_0 and +qaz_0
at +a^2/z_0 and -a^2/z_0.
 
mmm... so the series terminates after 3 terms? Interesting.
 
i know how to do this for a plane and a sphere but this 'mixed' case has got me confused.

Since you know the answer for the individual, why don't apply the super-position principle on them to get the answer for the "mixed" case?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K