Method to create a high current and low voltage

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the feasibility of creating a circuit that can produce a very high current (200 million amps) at a very low voltage, with participants exploring various technical aspects, potential applications, and implications of such a setup.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire whether the desired output is AC or DC, and what specific application is intended for such high current.
  • One participant mentions the need to sustain the high current for 0.18 seconds and questions the proximity of the nearest power substation.
  • There are discussions about the implications of using a large capacitor bank to achieve the desired current and the necessary capacitance for energy storage.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of producing 200 million amps, with references to historical applications of high current in aluminum production and skepticism regarding the claim of such high currents being achievable.
  • Participants discuss the potential use of Bitter coils and the energy implications of high currents, suggesting that the energy involved could be equivalent to significant amounts of TNT.
  • Some participants express doubts about the seriousness of the original question and suggest that it may be a form of trolling.
  • There are mentions of practical experiences with high current applications and the challenges associated with managing such currents in real-world scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some skepticism about the feasibility of the proposed current levels and others sharing personal experiences related to high current applications. No consensus is reached regarding the practicality of achieving 200 million amps at low voltage.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions regarding circuit impedance, energy storage requirements, and the physical limitations of materials when dealing with such high currents. There are unresolved questions about the specific application and the technical details necessary for implementation.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring high current applications in electrical engineering, researchers in experimental physics, and individuals involved in industrial applications of high currents.

  • #31
Another interesting way to make large currents at low voltage and DC is a homopolar generator, bonus you get mechanical energy storage in the form of a fly wheel.

I've read about people making spot welders and other high current things with by re winding micro wave transformers, single turn secondary type thing.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Rive said:
A bit of an advertising (sorry), but the main point can be seen here.
Big boy stator!

It always impresses me seeing larger than life versions of things, whether its power plant e machines where you can walk around inside the stator or ship diesel engines where the ratchet to remove the cylinder head bolts is hydraulically powered and has its own crane.
 
  • #33
Siddhartha Peri said:
DC high current capability, 200 million amps, research study
Let's do total cross-sectional current:
I'll build a toroid of 10 gauge magnet wire; inside diameter 2 feet; outside diameter 6 feet; thickness 1 foot.
So the windings will have 2 square feet of cross section. For 10-gauge magnet wire, that's about 15000 turns.
Each turn will average 4pi feet - so 188,500 feet. For that quantity, I think I could get the wire at $0.40 per foot. So $75,400.
The resistance across this toroid will be very close to 188.5 ohms.

If I was to do this with a single toroid, the current would need to be 200Mamps/15000 = 13,333 amps.
But my budget is $250K, so I can stack three of these. Getting the current in each to 4,444 amps. So I will need 838KVolts at 13,333 Amps for 180msec to power this. 11.2GW for 180msec = 2G joules. (560 KWhours)

The copper is 14grams/foot. So total weight of all three toroids would be 3*14*188,500 grams = 7.92Mg.

Taking the thermal mass (or density) of copper at 38.46J/gC. We have a temperature rise of 2GJ/(38.46J/gC * 7.92Mg) = 6.6 degrees Centigrade.
So we won't met the toroids.

Average price for electricity in the US is $0.12. So the energy cost is $67.

I still have $25000 left in my budget to find a way to go from AC to 838KVDC.

When I worked in Ayer, MA, there was an AC/DC power converter next door for electricity coming in from Canada. It was basically a 5-acre electric circuit.
He needs to borrow that for 180msec.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic and Fisherman199
  • #34
I have to try and look it up again, but years ago I was aware of a 3-set of laminated composite flywheels, these being series-connected homopolar generators which were wound up to speed, either from grid energy, or from diesel generator sets. Then, the high current pulse was made by switching the generators into the load, all in an effort to make an extremely strong pulse magnetic field for research. The storage flywheels weighed tons, supported on air bearings. 1.6 million amperes is a number that I remember.

Today there exists the remains of a 500 MegaJoules homopolar generator used along with a 7.7 MegaElectronVolts cyclotron operated at the Australian National University College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences back in the 1950's. It never completed the original mission, but was used for many other research projects.

At a more modest level, I have a PDF describing use of a homopolar generator to weld railway line, and yes .. it is old, from 1970's 1980's era. At 4.1MB, it is too large to upload, but it can be found at ..
https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/33237/PN_095_Aanstoos.pdf;sequence=1
Apparently 575kA pulse for 3.2s
 
  • #35
When they were running the Tokamak fusion reactor at Princeton University, they had two 100 ton (not sure about the weight) flywheels in the floor that were brought up to speed and then unloaded through the reactor. Their current creation was enormous (again, don't know the exact number), but was told by the tour guide that without the flywheels, the load would have blacked out Northern NJ.

Here's a description of the motor/generator set that produces the power. It seems very large, but I'm not really able to figure our what the amperage would be on discharge. Perhaps, one of our esteemed readers can decipher it. It gives power, and frequency, but I don't see the output voltage which I believe you'd need to figure amps.

"This paper provides a general description of 475 MVA pulsed motor generators for TFTR (Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor) at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. Two identical generators operating in parallel are capable of supplying 950 MVA for an equivalent square pulse of 6.77 sec and 4,500 MJ at 0.7 power factor to provide the energy for the pulsed electrical coils and heating system for TFTR. The description includes the operational features of the 15,000 HP wound rotor motors driving each generator with its starting equipment and cycloconverter for controlling speed, power factor, and regulating line voltage during load pulsing where the generator speed changes from 87.5 to 60 Hz frequency variation to provide the 4,500 MJ or energy. The special design characteristics such as fatigue stress calculations for 1,000,000 cycles of operation, forcing factor on exciter to provide regulation, and low generator impedance are reviewed."

I have a resistance soldering system that produces up to 100 amps at 3 volts.
 
  • #36
homopolar generator
 
  • #37
trainman2001 said:
When they were running the Tokamak fusion reactor at Princeton University, they had two 100 ton (not sure about the weight) flywheels in the floor that were brought up to speed and then unloaded through the reactor. Their current creation was enormous (again, don't know the exact number), but was told by the tour guide that without the flywheels, the load would have blacked out Northern NJ.
It's been a fun thread with lots of interesting posts, despite the OP going AWOL. It's probably time to tie off the thread, though. Thanks for the posts. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and jim hardy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K