Andre said:
Hope that Mew mew and you are recovering a bit, Christine, from all that hardship, Could it be a reaction to the medicine?
I think it's a combination of the wet food that he's eating (extra moist from what I can see), the antibiotic, and the phenoxybenzamine. (I think the phenoxybenzamine is mixed with fish oil)
But that bill is nothing short of robbery, I'd say, I think whenever possible you should make a case of it. Perhaps that publicity could deter and they may settle. I don't know. Something like that would be quite impossible here.
They made a big deal about giving us a 10% discount. That was with the discount.
They could sue me for defamation. I'd rather not sue, because I'm sort of broke at the moment. Broke= I still need money to pay for my tuition and basic expenses and thus not enough to throw around suing people, when they can sue me back for double that.
Math Is Hard said:
Actually, I think the special treats I give my cat have cranberry extract in them. It's supposed to have a prophylactic effect of keeping harmful stuff from sticking to the urethra.
I'll have to check that out. Interesting.
Math Is Hard said:
That's an obscene amount of money! Do you have an itemized bill? This just doesn't make sense. I've never been charged over $100 for taking a cat in with a UTI. That included the medicine.
Itemized bill below:
Office examination: 45
X-ray-First view: 95
Urinalysis: 40
Pre-Anesthetic Profile: 65
IV Catheterization: 45
Fluid Therapy(IV): 35
Sedation-Feline: 50
Urethral Catheter: 175
Injections(Hosp.): (2) 50-150
Hospitalization (per day): (2) 130-195
Write-in Medications: 40-60
Actual total may vary between 770-955
Total after 10% discount: 693-859.50
And I've just noticed that they charged me the maximum for everything, not to mention, also adding cost of medication when they were supposed to be included in the cost.
I was robbed.
Moonbear said:
That contract ONLY protects them from liability if they provide a standard level of care, NOT if they screw up. Don't be mistaken. No contract can take away your rights if they don't provide proper treatment in the first place...that's part of the agreement, that they'll do the best they can and in return, you won't sue them if your pet dies anyway because it's not something that can be treated...but they have to do the best they can, not some half-assed job that leaves him all bruised.
Great, now if I actually had anything left after that vet bill, I'd probably bring them to court.
I agree with MIH and Andre and others...that bill is ridiculous for treating a UTI, especially when it seems they were letting some brand new vet tech in training learn to clip fur on your cat (it would be appalling if that much razor burn and cuts from the clipping came from someone supposedly experienced). It didn't cost that much for my cat to be anesthetized, spayed and microchipped all in one visit (I had them microchip her while she was anesthetized...why stick her while she's awake if they had her under anyway), and that WAS an expensive vet.
They even told me that they would give me a discount on neutering if we did that the same day! The doctor cut him with the scissors when removing his bandages...

. I said something and then, the just did it later when I wasn't there.
Diarrhea could be a side effect of the antibiotic, but not a good one. If it was just softer than usual stools, I wouldn't be concerned, but if it's diarrhea, he should get a different antibiotic. I'd suggest calling a different vet that's not so expensive, have his records transferred and let the new vet prescribe the new antibiotic. Did they do a fecal test on him when you brought him in? If not, the new vet can do that too before changing antibiotics, because the other than a side effect of antibiotics, it's also possible that struggling with an infection and the mild disruption of gut bacteria from the antibiotic has given parasites a chance to flourish...he should be checked for worms and amoebae unless that was already done before his treatment started and they know he was cleared of parasites.
It was just softer than normal. Enough to smear and get on his fur.
He's not used to the wet food either, but according to the vet he can't eat anything else for a week. There was no fecal test done.