Michelson Morley experiment: relativistic explanation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of special relativity to the Michelson-Morley experiment, specifically addressing the timing of light rays in a moving interferometer. Participants explore the implications of time dilation and length contraction on the behavior of light in this experimental setup.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how time dilation and length contraction can explain the absence of a delay between the two rays in the moving reference frame of the interferometer, presenting calculations for the time taken for each path.
  • Another participant asserts that the time taken cannot simply be calculated as length divided by the speed of light, emphasizing that the apparatus is in motion.
  • A third participant reminds that the path length for the second ray is affected by the motion of the mirrors, suggesting that the effective path length differs from the static length of the apparatus.
  • A participant shares an animation, potentially as a visual aid to clarify the concepts discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of special relativity to the experiment, with no consensus reached on how to reconcile the calculations presented.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the effects of motion on path lengths and timing, as well as the implications of relativistic effects in this specific experimental context.

crick
Messages
39
Reaction score
4
I don't uderstand how, using special relativity theory (time dilatation and length contraction), one can explain why in the Michelson interferometer there is no delay between the two rays in the reference frame where the interferometer is moving. Consider the picture ##2.##

michelson_fig_1.jpg
Setting ##ab_1=ac=L## and ##\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}## (##v## is the velocity of the interferometer), the time taken for path ##aba_1## should be
$$t_1=\frac{2L}{c}\gamma$$For the other ray the path length should be ##aca## (but it's contracted), therefore

$$t_2=\frac{2L}{c}\frac{1}{\gamma}$$How can possibly be ##t_1=t_2##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the second case you are missing the fact that the time taken is not the length divided by c. The apparatus is moving!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: crick
crick said:
For the other ray the path length should be aca (but it's contracted)
Dont forget that the mirrors are moving, so the path length is different from the apparatus length.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: crick
This animation might help:
length_con2.gif
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: crick

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K