Micro-canonical Ensemble of Ideal Bose Gas

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ang Han Wei
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ensemble Gas
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the role of partitions in calculating the number of states for ideal Bose and Fermi gases. Partitions are considered a mathematical tool rather than having physical significance, aiding in problem-solving when necessary. For Fermi gases, the exclusion principle limits the occupancy of states, while for Bose gases, multiple particles can occupy the same state, leading to different counting methods. The general formulas for the number of states are derived, highlighting the factorial calculations involved for both types of particles. Ultimately, understanding when to use partitions simplifies the analysis of particle distributions in quantum systems.
Ang Han Wei
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,
can I know why the number of partitions separating different states have to be taken into account for the derivation of number of states in an ideal Bose Gas but not in the Fermi Gas?

What is the physical significance of this "partition"? In what ways can they vary?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's just a math trick to easily calculate the total number of states. The partitions have no physical significance whatsoever.
 
I see that there are some occasions when such partitions are called into use and they have to be taken into the total number of possible states in a factorial, while at other times, they do not appear.

How would one know when such partitions are to be taken into account?
 
The partitions should be used when they help solve the problem at hand. They have no physical significance and it is always possible to solve a problem without mentioning them. But sometimes they make it much easier to solve a problem. For instance, suppose you are calculating the number of ways that you can put two Fermions in three boxes, since each box can contain either zero or one fermion, than you can count them as follows
1: (1|1|0)
2: (1|0|1)
3: (0|1|1)
for a total of three states.
You can see that the first fermion can go in anyone of the three boxes, and second fermion can go on any of the remaining 2 boxes. 3*2=6= 3!/1!. At the ed you must divide by 2! because the fermions are identical so permutations among them won't create new states. You have then a total of 3!/(2!*1!)= 3 states. That can be generalized to

# of states = N!/[(N-n)!*n!] for n fermions on N boxes.

Now suppose you have two bosons that need to be placed in three boxes. since you can have more than one boson per boxe (no exclusion principle applies to bosons), there will be more states. Let's count them
1: (2|0|0)
2: (1|1|0)
3: (1|0|1)
4: (0|2|0)
5: (0|1|1)
6: (0|0|2)
for a total of six states. How can we generalize that? Doesn't seem obvious at first.
Here comes the math trick. Let's represent the particles by a '*'. the six states can now be represented as
1: (**||)
2: (*|*|)
3: (*||*)
4: (|**|)
5: (|*|*)
6: (||**)
Physically the '*' represents a particle while the '|' represents nothing whatsoever, it is just part of the notation. But that doesn't matter. Mathematically you have four symbols, Two '*'s and two '|'s. This symbols can be placed in 4!=24 different orders, but since the '*'s are identical we must divide by 2!, and the '|'s are also identical so we also divide by 2!. You have then a total of 4!/(2!*2!)= 6 states. That can be generalized to

# of states = (N+n-1)!/[(N-1)!*n!] for n bosons in N boxes.

Voila!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top