Microcontroller, FPGA, or CPLD for Precision Pulse Control?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on selecting the best technology for precision pulse control, comparing microcontrollers, FPGAs, and CPLDs. Microcontrollers are noted for their simplicity and lower cost, making them suitable for basic tasks, while FPGAs and CPLDs offer greater flexibility and precision but come with a steeper learning curve and higher costs. The need for high-frequency resolution and pulse width precision leads to a consensus that FPGAs are more appropriate for complex applications. Participants also discuss learning resources for programming FPGAs and Verilog, emphasizing the importance of understanding design nuances for effective implementation. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the balance between cost, complexity, and application requirements in choosing the right technology.
  • #31
I'm studying the datasheet for the IC now. It looks like they actually implements some kind of serial command structure for this IC (Man it's practically a microcontroller on it's on). Here's a link to the datasheet. The I/O info starts on page 30:

http://www.ortodoxism.ro/datasheets2/2/049iw670xf1p0dyxsaoplk09ss3y.pdf

Man this just keeps getting better :smile: I'm glad I didn't add a microcontroller to control the microcontroller :redface:

- Jason O
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
24K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K