Midterm Practice: Could some verify my proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnnyICON
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Midterm Proof
johnnyICON
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Midterm Practice: Could someone verify my proof

A sample question that I tried proving is:

Formally show that A \subseteq B,~then~A \cap C \subseteq B \cap C

My Proof:
Suppose x \in A \cap C. Then by definition of intersection, x \in A~and~x \in C. But as A \subseteq B,~then~x \in B. Hence, x \in B \cap C. And therefore, A \cap C \subseteq B \cap C.

Is there anything that I've missed? Is this even right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks fine to me.
 
Hallelujah!
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top