MHB Mike's question at Yahoo Answers regarding reduction of order

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reduction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using reduction of order to find a second linearly independent solution to the differential equation y'' + 2y' + y = 0, given that one solution is xe^{-x}. By substituting y(x) = v(x)xe^{-x} into the equation and computing the necessary derivatives, the process leads to a simplified equation. This results in the expression x^2v''(x) + 2xv'(x) = 0, which can be integrated to find v(x) = -c_1/x + c_2. Ultimately, the second solution is determined to be y(x) = e^{-x}, confirming the linear independence of the solutions.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

The differential equation

$$y''+2y'+y=0$$

has linear independent solutions $e^{-x}$ and $xe^{-x}$. Pretend you only know that $xe^{-x}$ is a solution, and use reduction of order to obtain a second linearly independent solution.

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Mike,

We are given the nontrivial solution:

$$f(x)=xe^{-x}$$

So, let's set:

$$y(x)=v(x)f(x)$$ and substitute for the derivatives of $y(x)$ into the given ODE. Thus, computing the needed derivatives, we find:

$$y'(x)=v(x)f'(x)+v'(x)f(x)$$

$$y''(x)=v''(x)f(x)+2v'(x)f'(x)+v(x)f''(x)$$

Now we need to compute the derivatives of $f(x)$:

$$f'(x)=-xe^{-x}+e^{-x}=e^{-x}(1-x)$$

$$f''(x)=-e^{-x}+(x-1)e^{-x}=e^{-x}(x-2)$$

And so we find:

$$y'(x)=v(x)e^{-x}(1-x)+v'(x)xe^{-x}=e^{-x}\left(v(x)(1-x)+xv'(x) \right)$$

$$y''(x)=v''(x)xe^{-x}+2v'(x)e^{-x}(1-x)+v(x)e^{-x}(x-2)=e^{-x}\left(xv''(x)+2v'(x)(1-x)+v(x)(x-2) \right)$$

Substituting into the original ODE, we find:

$$e^{-x}\left(xv''(x)+2v'(x)(1-x)+v(x)(x-2) \right)+2\left(e^{-x}\left(v(x)(1-x)+xv'(x) \right) \right)+v(x)xe^{-x}=0$$

Since $$e^{-x}\ne0$$ we may divide through by this factor to obtain:

$$xv''(x)+2v'(x)(1-x)+v(x)(x-2)+2v(x)(1-x)+2xv'(x)+v(x)x=0$$

Distribute:

$$xv''(x)+2v'(x)-2xv'(x)+xv(x)-2v(x)+2v(x)-2xv(x)+2xv'(x)+xv(x)=0$$

Combine like terms:

$$xv''(x)+2v'(x)=0$$

Multiply through by $x$:

$$x^2v''(x)+2xv'(x)=0$$

Now the left side is the differentiation of a product:

$$\frac{d}{dx}\left(x^2v'(x) \right)=0$$

Integrate with respect to $x$ to obtain:

$$\int\,d\left(x^2v'(x) \right)=\int\,dx$$

$$x^2v'(x)=c_1$$

$$v'(x)=c_1x^{-2}$$

Integrate again with respect to $x$:

$$\int\,dv=c_1\int x^{-2}\,dx$$

$$v(x)=-c_1x^{-1}+c_2$$

For simplicity, let $c_1=-1$ and $c_2=0$ and so:

$$v(x)=\frac{1}{x}$$

And hence, we find our second linearly independent solution is:

$$y(x)=v(x)f(x)=\frac{1}{x}xe^{-x}=e^{-x}$$

Shown as required.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top