Undergrad Minimization using Lagrange multipliers

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on solving expressions related to minimization using Lagrange multipliers, specifically focusing on the equations involving the curl of vector fields. A user presents derived expressions for bV and B_s but notes discrepancies when compared to expected results, particularly the absence of a curl(B) term. Guidance is requested for verifying the correctness of the equations and for step-by-step assistance in the minimization process. A suggestion is made to rewrite the Lagrangian in tensor notation and apply the Euler-Lagrange equations to derive the desired results. The conversation emphasizes the importance of proper notation and methodical application of theoretical principles in field theory.
TheCanadian
Messages
361
Reaction score
13
Given the following expressions:

Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 8.13.00 PM.png


and that ## \bf{B}_s = \nabla \times \bf{A}_s ##

how does one solve for the following expressions given in (12) and (13)?

Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 8.13.11 PM.png


I've attempted doing so and derive the following expressions (where the hat indicates a unit vector):

## bV = \bf{ \hat{V}} \cdot {\bf{B}_s} + \bf{A}_s \cdot (\nabla \times \bf{\hat{V}}) ##

## {\bf{B}}_s \cdot (\nabla \times {\bf{\hat{A}}_s)} = B_s = ( \frac{1}{a} + \frac {1}{b}){B}_s + \frac{1}{2b}[\bf{V} \cdot (\nabla \times\bf{ \hat {A}}_s) + \bf{\hat {A}}_s \cdot (\nabla \times {\bf{V}})] ##

Although similar in some terms, this is clearly not equivalent to what's stated above after considering further vector identities and there is no curl(B) term present anywhere. It seems so simple yet my calculation is quite a bit off. If anyone could guide me through this with steps they've taken (and possibly ensure the above equations are actually correct), that would be kindly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 8.13.00 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 8.13.00 PM.png
    9.9 KB · Views: 1,269
  • Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 8.13.11 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 8.13.11 PM.png
    9.1 KB · Views: 966
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have an integral of the type
$$E = \int d^3x L(\phi(x), \partial_i \phi(x))$$
which should be minimized. First, I suggest you to re-write the function ##L## inside the integral in tensor notations, for example ##\mathbf B = ∇ \times \mathbf A## is written as ##B_a = \epsilon_{abc}\partial_{b} A_c## (with ##\partial_i## I mean ##\frac {\partial}{\partial x_i}##). Once you have done that, use Euler-Langrange equations for fields https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_(field_theory) and Eq. (12) and (13) should follow. I didn't do it, but it seems to me it should work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K