Minimum Degree of a Random Graph (Probabilistic Method)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the minimum degree of a random graph $G(n, p)$ where the probability function $p$ satisfies $p >> n^{-1} \ln(n)$. It is established that as $n \rightarrow \infty$, the random graph almost surely has a minimum degree of at least $\frac{np}{2}$. The proof utilizes Chernoff's Inequality to bound the probability of a vertex having a degree less than $\frac{np}{2}$. Furthermore, it concludes that for any fixed positive integer $k$, the minimum degree of $G(n, p)$ is at least $k$ almost surely as $n$ increases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of random graphs, specifically $G(n, p)$ models.
  • Familiarity with Chernoff's Inequality for bounding probabilities.
  • Knowledge of variance and expectation in probability theory.
  • Basic concepts of asymptotic notation, particularly $o$ notation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Chernoff's Inequality in probabilistic proofs.
  • Explore the implications of the Erdős–Rényi model on graph theory.
  • Investigate further into asymptotic analysis and its relevance in random graph theory.
  • Learn about the properties of minimum degree in random graphs and their applications in network theory.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, and researchers in graph theory, particularly those interested in random graphs and probabilistic methods.

joypav
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
Problem:
Suppose that the function $p : N \rightarrow [0, 1]$ satisfies $p >> n^{-1}ln(n)$ (i.e. $n^{-1}ln(n) = o(p)$).

(a) Prove that as $n \rightarrow \infty$, the random graph $G(n, p)$ has minimum degree at least $\frac{np}{2}$ almost surely.
Idea: Look at the degree of each individual vertex $v \in V(G)$. Try to find a bound on the probability of this fixed vertex having a small degree (using Chernoff's Inequality?).

I am not getting to where I think I should with this idea.
Let $X_{u,v}$ be $1$ is $uv \in E(G)$ and $0$ if $uv \notin E(G)$.
Then, $X_v = \sum_{u \in V(G), u \neq v} X_{u,v}$ will give us the degree of $v$.
Also, the $X_{u,v}$'s are uniform/independent (as $G$ is a random graph and edges are picked independently with probability $p$).
Now we may use Chernoff's? How do I use the first thing we assumed... that $p >> n^-1ln(n)$?


(b)
Conclude that for any fixed positive integer k, the random graph $G(n, p)$ has minimum
degree at least k almost surely as $n \rightarrow \infty$.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For completeness, I will post a "proof" I came up with. As you can see, at the end I skipped over some much needed justification that I couldn't seem to figure out. Some help with this would be appreciated!

However, I do think that my general idea is correct.

Proof: (a) Let $G \sim G(n,p)$. Fix $v \in V(G)$. Let $A_{v,u}$ be the event that $vu \in E(G)$ and let $X_{v,u}$ be its indicator. Then, $X_{v,u}=1$ with probability $p$ and $X_{v,u}=0$ with probability $1-p$. Because each possible edge is inserted independently, the $X_{v,u}$'s are independent. Let $X_v = \sum_{u \in V(G), u \neq v} X_{u,v}$, (giving the degree of $v$). Now we may use Chernoff's Inequality with:
$$\sigma^2 = Var[X_v] = np(1-p)$$
$$E[X_v] = \sum_{u \in V(G), u \neq v} E[X_{u,v}]=p(n-1)$$
Then,
$P[$degree of v is less than $\frac{np}{2}] = P[X_v \leq E[X_v] - \frac{np-2p}{2}] = P[X_v \leq \frac{np}{2}]$
$$ \leq e^{\frac{-(\frac{np-2p}{2})^2}{2(np+\frac{\frac{np-2p}{2}}{3})}} = e^{-\frac{3n^2p-12np+12}{28n-8}}$$
Let $X$: existence of vertices with degree less than $\frac{np}{2}$. Then,
$$P[X]= \sum_{v \in V(G)}P[X_v \leq \frac{np}{2}] \leq n\cdot e^{-\frac{3n^2p-12np+12}{28n-8}} = e^{ln(n)-\frac{3n^2p-12np+12}{28n-8}}$$
By assumption $p > > n^{-1}ln(n)$.
$$\Rightarrow ln(n)-\frac{3n^2p-12np+12}{28n-8} \rightarrow -\infty $$
$$\Rightarrow P[X]\rightarrow 0$$
Then every vertex of G must have degree at least $\frac{np}{2}$.

(b) Apply part (a). So we have $\delta(G) \geq \frac{np}{2}$ a.s. as $n \rightarrow \infty$. As long as $n \geq \frac{2k}{p}$, $\delta(G) \geq k$.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K