Minimun lens size (in meters) that will permit just resolving 2 stars

  • Thread starter Thread starter cheez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lens Stars
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the minimum lens size required to resolve two stars that are 1.1 arcseconds apart using light of 510 nm wavelength. The resolution condition states that the maximum of one image must coincide with the minimum of the other, leading to the formula involving the slit width and angle. Participants clarify that for small angles, sine and tangent can be approximated by the angle in radians. The angle of 1.1 arcseconds is converted to radians for calculations. The conversation emphasizes using the provided values to solve for the slit width effectively.
cheez
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
What is the minimun lens size (in meters) that will permit just resolving 2 stars 1.1 seconds apart using light of 510 nm?
For a slit of width a, light of wavelength L, the first minimun occurs at an angle t from the center, assume a slit shaped lens! E=E max L* sin(pi a sin(t)/L)/(pi a sin(t) )
Hint: you don't really need all of this. Resolution implies that the maximun of one image falls on the minimun of the other.
I have really no clue on how to this:cry: please help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cheez said:
I have really no clue on how to this:cry: please help!
The first minimum occurs when a sin (\theta) = \lambda.



In these problems, often the angles are so small that you may replace sin and tan by the angle itself at the condition of working in radians.

Then a \theta \approx \lambda.

They give you lambda and theta. Just convert theta in radians and solve for "a" which will be the slit width "a"
 
how to calculate theta? thanks you so much!
 
cheez said:
how to calculate theta? thanks you so much!
If one is given the distance between the sources of light (perpendicular to the line of sight) and the distance between the sources and the lens, there is a formula in terms of a tangent. But here you are in luck, they give you the value of theta in the problem!
They are 1.1 arcsecond apart (if they said second, they really meant arcsecond). Do you know what an arc second is? It is one degree divided by 3600 (this comes from the fact that one degree is 60 arcminutes and one arcminute is 60 arcsenonds). So your angle is 1.1/3600 degrees. Now convert that in radians, plug that in the equation and you are done.

Patrick
 
thx for your answer!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top