Minkowski metric - to sperical coordinates transformation

soi
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I need to transform cartesian coordinates to spherical ones for Minkowski metric.
Taking:
(x0, x1, x2, x3) = (t, r, α, β)

And than write down all Christoffel symbols for it.

I really have no clue, but from other examples I've seen i should use chain rule in first and symmetry of Christoffel symbol Tab=Tba
 
Physics news on Phys.org
soi said:
I need to transform cartesian coordinates to spherical ones for Minkowski metric.
Taking:
(x0, x1, x2, x3) = (t, r, α, β)

And than write down all Christoffel symbols for it.

I really have no clue, but from other examples I've seen i should use chain rule in first and symmetry of Christoffel symbol Tab=Tba

The spherical form of the Minkowsky metric is just

ds^{2} = c^2 dt^2 - dr^2 - r^2 d\theta^2 - r^2 sin^2(\theta) d\phi^2

So the metric components are
g_{tt} = c^2
g_{rr} = -1
g_{\theta\theta} = -r^2
g_{\phi\phi} = -r^2 sin^2(\theta)

The connection coefficients \Gamma_{uvw} are computed in terms of the metric components via:

\Gamma_{uvw} = \frac{1}{2} (\partial_{v} g_{uw} + \partial_{w} g_{vu} - \partial_{u} g_{vw})
 
OK, great thanks for your help.

To look if I understand it, i calculated it using formula
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/f/f/d/ffdb897152259f912ad9c4d5ab3d474d.png

And i got what you got (not surprisingly) but with -1 everywhere:

gtt=-1
grr=1
gθθ=r^2
gββ=r^2(sinθ)^2

And Christoffel symbols (nonzoro, numering metric matrix from 0 to 3):
T221=1/r
T122=-r
T331=1/r
T332=1/2(rsinθ)^2
T133=-r (sinθ)^2
T233=(sin2θ)/2

Is it okay?
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top