Minuend Definition: How Did They Choose the Example Values?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bomba923
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definitions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the choice of example equations used in dictionary definitions, specifically the minuend, illustrated by the equation 50 - 34 = 16. Participants question how dictionaries select these examples, pondering whether the numbers are chosen randomly or through a statistical process. The significance of the numbers is debated, with one participant noting that 16 has mathematical properties that make it noteworthy, while 34 does not share similar significance. The conversation also touches on the frequency of this example across various dictionaries, with some participants noting that only a few dictionaries provide examples at all. Additionally, there is a brief exchange about the nature of mathematical equations versus equalities, and a side discussion about changing signatures and avatars on the forum. Overall, the thread reflects a deep curiosity about the rationale behind educational content in dictionaries and the implications of specific numerical examples.
bomba923
Messages
759
Reaction score
0
The dictionary definition of minuend,
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=minuend

includes the equation 50 - 34 = 16

:bugeye: How do they decide which equation to put in there? I mean, the values of 50 and 34, did someone just randomly think of two numbers ?
Did they use a statistical process, (for example, looking at the list of random numbers) to determine which values to place in as an example?

For something as important as a formal dictionary definition, how do they choose which values to use as an example? I mean, numerous English dictionaries display this EXACT equation! How, for something as significant and encompassing as a formal definition, did they come up with these values? A guy's random guess, an intensive statistical process, or...etc...
How did they decide on exactly these values?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that 16 is both a square and a fourth power, whereas 50 is EXACTLY one half of an extremely important square number!
But 34 is nothing of the kind!
Hence, vast philosophical panoramas open up by this exact equation, which no other equation could do equally well.
Thus, the definition of the minuend might be expected to lodge itself deeper in the subconscious of the reader.
 
'numerous' is such a vague term. Do you mean many dictionaries use this example or do you mean that two is a great number? (personally, I think 42 is a great number). Or were you just confused by the latin translation of minuend, "numerus minuendus" (number to be diminished)?

Admittedly, I only did a quick sample of about 25 on-line dictionaries, but only 4 had examples at all and only two used the example you noted.

I felt the "Math is Spoken Here" dictionary picked a particularly creative example: (4x - 3) - (-2x +1) = 6x - 4.

Dang, not only can you find a "Math is Spoken Here" dictionary, but you can also find a http://members.aol.com/dcurry4000/math.htm webpage (but isn't that recon's avatar?).

Edit: My fingers were inserting random 'e's - must be a subconscious fascination.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BobG said:
... you can also find a http://members.aol.com/dcurry4000/math.htm webpage (but isn't that recon's avatar?).
Heh! Cute web page! :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And one more thing

50-16=34 is not an equation.It's an equality.It's not an identity,since it's valid only in the base 10...

Daniel.
 
Hey, dexter, how did you change your signature? I thought altering your signature destroys it.
 
BicycleTree said:
Hey, dexter, how did you change your signature? I thought altering your signature destroys it.
Altering your avatar if you have one from before the last upgrade removes it. I think the signature is manual?
 
BicycleTree said:
Hey, dexter, how did you change your signature? I thought altering your signature destroys it.

Hehe,i wouldn't call that altering,but improving.Seneca quoted in original sounds a zillion times better than Heisenberg translated... :approve:

Yes,manually... :-p

Daniel.
 
Back
Top