MHB Minutes, Degrees, Seconds to Radians

AI Thread Summary
To convert the angle of 12 degrees, 28 minutes, and 4 seconds into radians, first convert the entire angle to decimal degrees. This involves calculating 12 + (28/60) + (4/3600), resulting in approximately 12.4678 degrees. Then, multiply this value by π/180 to convert degrees to radians. The final expression for the angle in radians is approximately 11221π/162000. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the conversions between degrees, minutes, seconds, and radians.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Express the following angle in radians.

12 degrees, 28 minutes, 4 seconds that is, 12° 28' 4".

I cannot apply pi/180° to this problem.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Use the same method I posted in your other thread, and use the fact that there are 3600 seconds in a degree. :D
 
Why can't you "apply pi/180" here?

You know that there are 60 seconds in a degree don't you? So 4''= 4/60= 0.06667 minutes approximately and 28' 4'' is 28.06667 minutes. And you know, I hope, that there are 60 minutes in a degree so that 28.06667 minutes is 28.06667/60= 0.4678 degrees. 12 degrees, 28 minutes, 4 seconds is 12.4678 degrees. Multiply that by pi/180.
 
MarkFL said:
Use the same method I posted in your other thread, and use the fact that there are 3600 seconds in a degree. :D

Is there another way to solve this problem?
 
RTCNTC said:
Is there another way to solve this problem?

What you want to do is convert strictly to degrees, and then to radians.

$$12^{\circ}28'4''=\left(12+\frac{28}{60}+\frac{4}{3600}\right)^{\circ}\cdot\frac{\pi}{180^{\circ}}=\frac{11221\pi}{162000}$$
 
It's all coming back to me now.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top