Misleading on Griffith electrodynamix(electric dipole)

  • Thread starter Thread starter galoisjung
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipole Griffith
AI Thread Summary
Griffith's explanation of polarization in dielectric materials suggests that charges can be offset, creating a dipole effect. However, there is confusion regarding how this offset occurs between molecules rather than within the same molecule, particularly between electrons and protons. The close proximity of protons and electrons raises questions about the feasibility of such an offset. The discussion highlights a perceived inconsistency in Griffith's model, as the visual representation shows a clear separation of charges. Overall, the debate centers on the validity of Griffith's depiction of charge distribution in electrodynamics.
galoisjung
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In the books of electrodynamics by Griffith, He explain the physical view of the polarization inside of the dielectric matter. He try to make a picture polarized charge being offset near one.
However, I wonder how the chage can be offset with other molecular but not with own proton. Definitely, distance between the eletron and proton is near than moleculars.
How could it happen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CUCUh1y.png
n1ulHBf.png
 
There is no offset. As you see in the picture, there is negative charge at the left end, positive at the right end, and zero charge along the rest of the line in between.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top