Missing component to get the impendance ohmic

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lindsayyyy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Component
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
15 replies · 2K views
Lindsayyyy
Messages
215
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi, following graphic is given (attachment)

Homework Equations


-



The Attempt at a Solution



I tried it with the following equation:

[tex]\omega iL-\frac i {\omega C} + X =R[/tex]

but I don't get to the solution, is this the right attempt? If yes, I'll try later on again, have to go to the university right now.

Thanks for the help :smile:
 

Attachments

  • Unbenannt.JPG
    Unbenannt.JPG
    4.9 KB · Views: 489
Physics news on Phys.org
what is the question?
 
ah sorry, I was in a hurry. I shall find the missing component so that the impendance/resistance of the series connection is just ohmic
 
L and R are parallel. What is their resultant impedance?

ehild
 
ehild said:
L and R are parallel. What is their resultant impedance?

ehild

Will that work?
the unknown resistance is also the part of LR circuit
 
The impendance is:

[tex]\frac 1 Z = \frac 1 {i\omega L} - \frac {\omega C} {i}[/tex]

Do I have to solve it afterwards with the equation

[tex]R=X+Z[/tex]

And find the X ?
 
Lindsayyyy said:
The impendance is:

[tex]\frac 1 Z = \frac 1 {i\omega L} - \frac {\omega C} {i}[/tex]

Do I have to solve it afterwards with the equation

[tex]R=X+Z[/tex]

And find the X ?

That box in the figure is not a capacitor but a resistor R connected parallel to the inductor. And yes, Z+X has to be real.

ehild
 
Sorry everyone, I'm totally asleep at the switch, having exams in a few days and things are getting confused. I'll try it lateron, have so solve some other things first.

@ Cupid, I don't have any idea why I thought there's a capacity. maybe I should better look at the drawing

thanks everyone
 
I'm stuck, can't solve it.

I tried to calculate Z, my Z is the parallel connection between R and L

and I get for Z:

[tex]\frac 1 Z = \frac 1 R + \frac {1} {i \omega L}[/tex]

after some conversions I get to:

[tex]Z= \frac {R\omega^{2}L+iR^{2}\omega L} {R^{2}+\omega L^{2}}[/tex]

Now I want to get a pure ohmic resistance so

[tex]Z+X=R[/tex]

but I just can't solve it. The task says the missing component is a "normal" one, so I guess it should be a capacity, inductor etc. Though I tried to take one of these to test if I get a solution, I don't get to an answer. Can anyone help me:confused:
 
Lindsayyyy said:
I'm stuck, can't solve it.

I tried to calculate Z, my Z is the parallel connection between R and L

and I get for Z:

[tex]\frac 1 Z = \frac 1 R + \frac {1} {i \omega L}[/tex]

after some conversions I get to:

[tex]Z= \frac {R\omega^{2}L+iR^{2}\omega L} {R^{2}+\omega L^{2}}[/tex]
Check your algebra. The ω in the term in the denominator should be squared, and the L in the real portion of the numerator should also be squared.

Once you've sorted that out, divide the expression into two parts: the real part and the imaginary part. It's the imaginary part that you want to "take care of" with the new impedance X.
 
Hope I haven't done any mistakes again:

[tex]X=R- \frac {R\omega^{2}L^{2}} {R^{2}+\omega^{2}L^{2}} - \frac {iR^{2}\omega L} {R^{2}+\omega^{2}L^{2}}[/tex]

so in order to get a pure ohmic term my X has to be:

[tex]X= \frac {iR^{2}\omega L} {R^{2}+\omega^{2}L^{2}}[/tex]

but what component is that? I don't get it :(
 
Lindsayyyy said:
Hope I haven't done any mistakes again:

[tex]X=R- \frac {R\omega^{2}L^{2}} {R^{2}+\omega^{2}L^{2}} - \frac {iR^{2}\omega L} {R^{2}+\omega^{2}L^{2}}[/tex]

so in order to get a pure ohmic term my X has to be:

[tex]X= \frac {iR^{2}\omega L} {R^{2}+\omega^{2}L^{2}}[/tex]

but what component is that? I don't get it :(

If you let Z be the impedance of the parallel R and L components, then you've found that

[tex]Z = \frac {R\omega^{2}L^{2}} {R^{2}+\omega^{2}L^{2}} + i\frac {R^{2}\omega L} {R^{2}+\omega^{2}L^{2}}[/tex]

In order to cancel the imaginary term you need to put in series an impedance that is its negative, that is,

[tex]X = - i\frac {R^{2}\omega L} {R^{2}+\omega^{2}L^{2}}[/tex]

Now, what sort of component has an impedance that yields a negative imaginary term?
 
I'd say capcity with:

[tex]R_{C}=-\frac i {\omega C}[/tex]

if that answer is right, I still don't understand why to use this one
 
Lindsayyyy said:
I'd say capcity with:

[tex]R_{C}=-\frac i {\omega C}[/tex]

if that answer is right, I still don't understand why to use this one

Yes, a capacitor gives a negative imaginary impedance. :smile:

If you set the above expression for a capacitor's impedance equal to the X expression then you can solve for C, the value that the capacitor must have in order to cancel out the imaginary term of the impedance in Z at a given frequency ω.
 
Last edited:
Ok, thank your very much