MIT Acceptance Despite no first rank

AI Thread Summary
Admission to graduate programs at MIT is possible even for candidates who are not top rankers in their schools, with success largely depending on the field of study and the applicant's unique qualifications. The competitiveness of applicants from overseas, particularly in theoretical sciences and biology, can impact acceptance rates for U.S. students. Experience in reputable research programs and strong letters of recommendation from established principal investigators are crucial for standing out. Maintaining a GPA above 3.5-3.6 is generally advisable to avoid immediate rejection. Networking and gaining diverse research experiences are emphasized as beneficial strategies. While GRE scores are not the primary focus, achieving a reasonable score is important. Examples of successful applicants demonstrate that strong academic performance, research experience, and personal qualities can outweigh class rank in the admissions process.
absurdist
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Did any 1 get into grad school at MIT without being the first ranker at your school?
If yes what was it that made you stand out??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on the field you're applying for and how much they need a certain type of grad student.

If you're in the U.S., you're much less likely to be accepted into a top school if you are applying as a theoretical science (or biology), simply because of competition overseas where they cannot afford the expensive laboratory equipment that we can. They simulate everything, so they will in all likeliness have much more experience than you.

On the other hand, you can differentiate yourself through experience from good research programs and letters of recommendation from reputable principal investigators (people in charge of research).

If a certain field does not have as much funding, such as various soft sciences, it is also less likely that the school will want/need you.

If you maintain above a 3.5-3.6 GPA, that should be a relative safe zone as far as immediate rejection goes from schools like MIT.

Try to network and work under at least 2 but preferably 3 different P.I.s, one being a professor at your school, and 2 at REUs.

GREs aren't too important, but you shouldn't tank it. Here's a point of comparison:

3.8 GPA
1380 GRE/5.0 Analytical writing (49th percentile Chem GRE lol)
No publications
Various Chemistry awards
1 Letter of recommendation from a German professor during a DAAD-RISE research experience
1 Letter of recommendation from an NAS member
1 Letter of recommendation from school professor who is a Harvard PhD alumni

And this student was accepted into Harvard grad school for Chemical Physics (along with MIT, Stanford, and Caltech).

He's a very sociable and friendly guy, but he calls himself a moron albeit being accepted into almost all of the top 5 schools. I don't think he was anywhere near being the top ranker at his school (UCI).

As he's told me, most of your competition will be partying on the weekends. That's when you need to be studying.
 
There was a guy from my school last year who got into the comp sci PhD at MIT. I have no idea what his class rank was (I'm not even sure if my school does class rankings...I've never seen them), but he was a fantastic student. He was a double major and I have to imagine he was the best student in his year in both depts. He did honors and everything.
 
I know two people who were accepted to MIT who both go to the same school. They are not both number one in the class => you can be accepted without being number one.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top