Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Model of Galactic Black Hole Candidates

  1. Jun 17, 2006 #1

    pervect

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    In another thread, Nerid mentions

    The Magnetospheric Eternally Collapsing Object (MECO) Model of Galactic Black Hole Candidates and Active Galactic Nuclei.


    also at http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0602453

    This apparently has been published, though I'm not positive if where it was published was a peer-reviewed journal.

    I thought I would comment on it from a GR perspective since there appears to be some interest in the topic.

    This quote strikes me as being seriously confused. Horizon crossing geodiscs for infalling matter of positive rest mass are definitely not null geodesics!

    [add]
    True statement:

    The velocity of an object falling into a black hole approaches 'c' relative to an observer hovering, with rockets, a constant Schwarzschild 'r' coordinate. As the hovering observer getrs closer and closer to the event horizon, the velocity of the falling object get's closer and closer to 'c'.

    False statement:

    The geodisic of an object falling into a black hole is null. One simply cannot infer that the geodesic is null from the above true statements, even though the limiting velocity is 'c'.
    [end add]

    The nature of the Lorentz interval between two points on the geodesic (time-like, null, or space-like) can be calculated in any coordinate system where the metric is not singular at the horizon. This excludes standard Schwarzschild coordinates if the calculation is done rigorously, as g_tt = 0 and g_rr is infinite. One can show however, that geodesics have the expected timelike behavior in the limit as one approaches or leaves the event horizon even in Schwarzschild coordinates.

    In addition, one can use any one of several well-behaved coordinate systems such as Eddington-Finklestein or Krusak-Szerkes to eliminate the coordinate singularity at the event horizon entirely, and show that the trajectory is purely timelike, as expected.

    See for instance MTW, "Gravitation", pg 824 for a solution for r parameterized in terms of the arbitrary parameter n for an object falling at rest from a starting height r_max into a black hole.

    r = (1/2) r_max (1 + cos(n))
    tau = sqrt(r_max^3/8M)*(n+sin(n))

    The region of interest is 0<n<Pi, during which it can be seen that proper time tau is finite, and increasing, and r is decreasing from r_max to zero.

    The fact that the proper time exists shows that the geodesic is timelike, though this can be confirmed by detailed caluclations.

    I've omitted the solution for the Schwarzschild 't' coordinate for the geodesic as it is rather difficult to type in - only if there is serioius interest will I go into more detail.

    [add]
    Note that as E_0 is constant for an object following a geodesic in the Schwarzschild metric, g_00 dt/dtau will be constant. This should allow anyone sufficiently interested to solve for the expression for t, though it would certainly be easier just to look it up in the reference.
     
    Last edited: Jun 17, 2006
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 27, 2006 #2

    Chris Hillman

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    "Wheeler was wrong" [sic]

    Hi, pervect, I plan to avoid debunking in this forum, but perhaps I can get away with a modest gloss:

    Incredible as it may seem, the claim has been made (repeatedly) by one of the "inventors" of the MECO proposal that the world line of a test particle falling into a Schwarzschild hole becomes null as it crosses the horizon. This is of course incorrect, as you and I and in fact any decent student of an advanced undergraduate gtr course know very well, but the authors of the eprint in question may have acquired this misconception from him. This is pretty basic stuff; speaking for myself, I tend to stop reading as soon as I see an error of this magnitude.

    Chris Hillman
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Model of Galactic Black Hole Candidates
  1. Black hole (Replies: 284)

  2. Black hole (Replies: 5)

Loading...