Modeling a graph that shows age in relation to depth of an ice sample

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around modeling a graph that relates age to the depth of an ice sample, focusing on the mathematical relationships and functions involved in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods for calculating age based on depth, including the use of integrals and interpolation techniques. Questions arise regarding the assumptions of constant thickness and the functional form of λ(z).

Discussion Status

Several approaches have been suggested, including linear interpolation, spline interpolation, and numerical methods like Euler's method. Participants are actively discussing the implications of these methods and the challenges of modeling the relationship accurately.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of constraints such as the lack of software tools for graphing data and the need for assumptions about the behavior of λ as a function of depth.

hey123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
The thickness of the annually deposited ice layers in the ice core can be determined by examining chemical impurities and isotope ratios. Under pressure, ice exhibits the properties of a liquid. Therefore, the ice in the Greenland ice sheet is not only compressed, but also moves from the ice shelf towards the coasts. As a result, the layers of ice deposited each year become thinner with increasing depth. The following table shows the thickness of the ice layers in meters per year for the NEEM drill core:

Depth z in m 0 500 1000 1200 1400 1500 1600 Thickness per year λ in m a-1 0.25 0.20 0.13 0.10 0.037 0.018 0.010

Using the data from the table, create a graph that approximately shows the age t in a of an ice sample as a function of the depth z at which the sample was taken.
Relevant Equations
a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ.
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use linear interpolation between the data points. Between z_i and z_{i+1} that gives you \int_{z_i}^z \frac{1}{\lambda(z)}\,dz = \int_{z_i}^z \frac{1}{A_i + B_iz}\,dz which you can do analytically.
 
I don't have Excel installed right now so I can't graph your data. But here's what I would do.

Plot your data. Try to guess what a good shape for λ as a function of z. That is, find λ(z). Just eyeballing the data it looks like a straight line fit is not hopeless but not particularly good.

Then note that λ is the increase per year of z. That means ##\frac{dz}{dt} = \lambda## . That is, the rate of change of depth is just λ. Hopefully the shape of the curve you get is one that you can solve the differential equation for.

If you can't solve the differential equation, here is what you can do to approximate it. It's called Euler's methods. (Look it up if you are using it.) Start with z=0 at t=0 and your λ for z=0. Then note that one year later, by assuming a constant speed for the first year, you will have a z1 of λ(0). Then for year 1 to 2 assume a constant speed of λ(z1) where z1 is the depth at the end of year 1. So you get λ(0)+λ(z1) at the end of year 2 for z2. λ(0)+ λ(z1)+λ(z2) at the end of year 3 for z3. And so on. If you have Excel (or any spreadsheet prog) you should be able to sum that pretty quickly. And graph it at every 100 years or so. Or you could write a short program in your favorite computer program language.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
8K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K