Modelling eddy currents in a pendulum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simulating eddy currents in a copper pendulum entering a magnetic field, utilizing Faraday's law. The main challenge is managing the multiple variables involved in calculating the induced electric field (E) and current (J). A suggested approach is to simplify the problem by starting with a circular loop instead of a disk, analyzing its motion into the magnetic field before extending to the pendulum's arc. This method aims to clarify the relationship between the induced currents and the resulting retarding forces. The conversation highlights the importance of breaking down complex problems into manageable parts for effective simulation.
FabusMarco
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I was solving a problem related to Eddie currents recently and I need some help with simulating it numerically. Basically, we have a disc-like copper pendulum entering a region of uniform magnetic flux density B (see diagram). I understand that I need to use Faraday's law:
\nabla \times \vec{E} = - \frac {\partial{\vec B}} {\partial t},
but even if I assume B is in the z-direction and E is in the x-y plane, I am left with
\frac {\partial{E_y}} {\partial x} - \frac {\partial{E_x}} {\partial y} = - \frac {\partial{B}} {\partial t}.
Once I have E, I can find J and subsequently the current induced. However, do I not have too many variables? And how could I then find the retarding force, given that it depends on things like the velocity of moving charges?

Many thanks for your help in advance.

Diagram:
17887639_1382459645174041_1954335255_o.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I were attacking this problem, I would not use a top-down approach. Instead of a disk, I would start with a circular loop; once I understand the loop, I can integrate loops to get the disk. Also, I would first consider the loop going into the field region in a straight line; once I understand that, I can extend to the arc of a pendulum.
 
kuruman said:
If I were attacking this problem, I would not use a top-down approach. Instead of a disk, I would start with a circular loop; once I understand the loop, I can integrate loops to get the disk. Also, I would first consider the loop going into the field region in a straight line; once I understand that, I can extend to the arc of a pendulum.
Thanks for the idea, I'll try it out!
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top