Modern Physics - velocity of electron accelerated through 6 Mev

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the velocity of an electron accelerated through 6 MeV from rest, focusing on the implications of relativistic effects on mass and speed.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between mass and energy in the context of relativistic physics, questioning why mass increases alongside speed when starting from rest. There are discussions on the validity of using Newtonian versus relativistic approaches to energy conservation.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various perspectives on the concept of relativistic mass and its implications for the problem at hand. Some participants express confusion about the underlying principles, while others provide insights into the differences between classical and relativistic physics.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the constraints of classical physics in addressing relativistic scenarios, particularly when velocities approach significant fractions of the speed of light. Participants also note that misunderstandings about mass and energy conservation are common in this context.

shivam01anand
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Modern Physics -- velocity of electron accelerated through 6 Mev

Homework Statement



Electron accelerated through 6 Mev. from rest. My Answer was > speed of light

Homework Equations

Then our professor told us to not conserve KE only as mass was increased. Therefore use einstein's e=mc^2.

The Attempt at a Solution



he gave us the formulas of new mass vs old mass at rest.

I just don't get it why is mass increased as well as speed increased even though we're starting from rest
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi shivam01anand! welcome to pf! :smile:
shivam01anand said:
I just don't get it why is mass increased as well as speed increased even though we're starting from rest

mass is energy, energy is mass

in Newtonian physics, mass is constant, so (even though it's energy), we can ignore it in the conservation-of-energy equation!

in relativistic physics, mass is not constant, so the conservation-of-energy equation must include mass-after minus mass-before :wink:
 
Wait, How come if this same question came when i studied electric field and applied the wrong method[ i.e energy conservation] it would have been correct?
 
shivam01anand said:
Wait, How come if this same question came when i studied electric field and applied the wrong method[ i.e energy conservation] it would have been correct?

Because when you "studied electric field" you neglected relativistic effects.

Relativistic effects can be ignored for v< ~ 0.1c. If your computations using kinetic and potential energies indicate a velocity greater than about 0.1c then you must redo your computations using relativistic equations.
 
yes, for ordinary speeds, the error is less than 1 in 1012, way too small to take any notice of! :smile:
 
shivam01anand said:
I just don't get it why is mass increased as well as speed increased even though we're starting from rest
Just to anticipate a possible misunderstanding...
In relativity, what you used to think of as KE is the gain in mass. So don't go calculating a gain in KE (by Newton) and a gain in mass (by Einstein) and adding them together.
 
shivam01anand said:
I just don't get it why is mass increased as well as speed increased even though we're starting from rest


Don't feel bad. No one else 'got it' either until Einstein explained it in 1905. Even then, it took a while before many physicists 'got it'! :smile:
 
The argument about the validity of the concept of relativistic mass has been deleted. It's clear from the opening post that the answer is expected to be given using the framework of relativistic mass, so if you don't like relativistic mass, use it anyway or keep your fingers away from your keyboard.

Arguments about relativistic mass go in the relativity forum in the main Physics section.
 
Last edited:
jtbell said:
if you don't like relativistic mass, use it anyway or keep your fingers away from your keyboard.

.



lol funny
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K