Programs Module Choice advice for a theoretical physics degree (Durham)

AI Thread Summary
Starting at Durham on September 29, the discussion centers on choosing between 40 credits of maths modules for scientists and 40 credits of regular maths modules. The concern is whether the maths and physics course would better prepare for a PhD in theoretical physics compared to the regular theoretical physics course. Insights suggest that the specific initial course may not significantly impact future PhD opportunities, as adaptability and mastery of topics are more critical. It is recommended to select modules based on personal interest, as enjoyment can lead to better performance. Additionally, exploring Durham PhD theses and consulting supervising professors for advice on module choices is encouraged. Ultimately, the decision leans towards sticking with the regular modules.
Mabey
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm starting at Durham on the 29th of September and I need to get my module choices sorted. I have the choice between 40 credits of maths modules designed for scientists, and 40 credits of maths modules done by regular maths students. They say that you should only do the regular maths modules if you will transfer to the maths and physics course, but I'm not sure what would be best for my future plans(currently I plan to go on to do a PhD).

My question is, would the maths and physics course better prepare me for a PhD in theoretical physics or a similar field, or should I stay with the regular theoretical physics course. I've had a look at the future module choices myself, e.g. there is more GR in the fourth year for maths and physics, but obviously I don't really know what most of the modules actually entail since I'm only just starting.

here are the course structures for both courses(for the maths and physics one, go to the bottom of the pdf)

Maths and Physics: https://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/faculty.handbook/degrees/frameworks/fgc0.pdf
Theoretical Physics: https://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/faculty.handbook/degrees/frameworks/f344.pdf

Appreciate any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general it does not matter much. I know people that moved from physics (MSc) to mechanical engineering (PhD) and from mathematics to physics. The initial condition is less important than your ability to quickly master a topic. I think it is better to take the module that you think is the most interesting, as people tend to score better on topics that they like more.
You do not know yet your PhD topic so it is difficult to say what you would need for that. But all of these courses will exist when you start your PhD so you can follow necessary courses at the start of your PhD.

You can also look for Durham PhD theses on topics that you like and and find the supervising professors. Ask them their opinion on the different modules.
 
bigfooted said:
In general it does not matter much. I know people that moved from physics (MSc) to mechanical engineering (PhD) and from mathematics to physics. The initial condition is less important than your ability to quickly master a topic. I think it is better to take the module that you think is the most interesting, as people tend to score better on topics that they like more.
You do not know yet your PhD topic so it is difficult to say what you would need for that. But all of these courses will exist when you start your PhD so you can follow necessary courses at the start of your PhD.

You can also look for Durham PhD theses on topics that you like and and find the supervising professors. Ask them their opinion on the different modules.
Okay thank you, I think I'll stick with the regular modules
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top